Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36150669›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2023

Environmental and Climate Impact Perceptions in University Students: Sustainability Motivations and Perceptions Correspond With Lower Red Meat Intake.

Melissa J Slotnick, Jennifer Falbe, Juliana F W Cohen, Ashley N Gearhardt, Julia A Wolfson, Cindy W Leung

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Health-Promoting and Sustainable Behavior in University Students in Germany: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melissa J Slotnick
Jennifer Falbe
Juliana F W Cohen
Ashley N Gearhardt
Julia A Wolfson
Cindy W Leung

Funding

Understanding the risk of obesity in food-insecure children: the hidden role of stressR00HD084758 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LEUNG, CINDY · 2017 to 2020
$820k
Reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among young adults: A point-of-selection experimentK01DK113068 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FALBE, JENNIFER · 2018 to 2022
$814k
Development and Pilot Evaluation of a Novel Cooking Skills Intervention to Prevent DiabetesK01DK119166 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WOLFSON, JULIA A · 2020 to 2023
$607k
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD084758NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK113068NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK119166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRed meat production is a leading contributor to food-related greenhouse gas emissions. Decreasing red meat intake can mitigate climate change and lower risk of diet-related diseases.

objectiveThe goal of this study is to evaluate university students' perceptions of climate-friendly behaviors and to assess how these perceptions are associated with the frequency of red meat intake.

designCross-sectional survey

settingA large, public California university and a large, public Michigan university

participantsUndergraduate students from a California university (n = 721) and a Michigan university (n = 568)

main outcome measuresPerceptions of climate-friendly behaviors and frequency of red meat intake STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Differences in perceptions by student characteristics were compared using t-tests and one-way analysis of variance. Associations between perceptions of climate-friendly behaviors and red meat intake frequency were examined using generalized linear models, adjusted for sociodemographic covariates.

resultsAcross both universities, students rated reducing meat intake as less effective than other climate change mitigation behaviors such as recycling and using less plastic. However, students who reported (1) making food and beverage choices that "are good for the environment," (2) making food and beverage choices that "reduce climate change impact," or (3) agreeing that "eating less meat is an effective way to combat climate change" reported 10% to 25% lower frequency of red meat intake for each point higher on the agreement scale. In contrast, making food and beverage choices motivated by health was not associated with frequency of red meat intake.

conclusionsSustainability motivations and perceptions of meat's climate impact were associated with lower frequency of red meat intake, despite the overall moderate rating of eating less meat as an effective climate change mitigator. This research lends support to behavioral interventions, public education campaigns, and policies aiming to reinforce sustainable dietary patterns in young adults.

Indexed as

MotivationRed MeatCross-Sectional StudiesDietHumansMeatStudentsUniversitiesYoung AdultClimate changeEnvironmental attitudesPlant-based dietsRed meatYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID36150669
PMCPMC10764093
OpenAlexW4296515422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.