Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36150408›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2022

Decision Aid Interventions for Family Caregivers of Persons With Advanced Dementia in Decision-Making About Feeding Options: A Scoping Review.

Yaolin Pei, Xiang Qi, Dena Schulman-Green, Mengyao Hu, Kaipeng Wang, Bei Wu

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yaolin PeiRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Xiang QiRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Dena Schulman-GreenRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Mengyao HuRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Kaipeng WangGraduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Bei WuRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: bei.wu@nyu.edu.
New York University · USUniversity of Denver · US

Funding

Rutgers-NYU Center for Asian Health Promotion and EquityP50MD017356 · NIMHD · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI SETOGUCHI IWATA, SOKO, ZHENG, YAGUANG · 2021 to 2025
$11.6M
NIMHD NIH HHS P50 MD017356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe provided an overview of the literature on decision aid interventions for family caregivers of older adults with advanced dementia regarding decision making about tube feeding. We synthesized (1) the use of theory during the development, implementation, and evaluation of decision aids; (2) the development, content, and delivery of decision aid interventions; (3) caregivers' experience with decision aid interventions; and (4) the effect of decision aid interventions on caregivers' quality of decision-making about feeding options.

designScoping review.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed studies published January 1, 2000-June 30, 2022, in MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases. The process was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework, which includes identifying the research question, choosing related studies, charting the data, and summarizing results. Empirical articles concerning the decision aid interventions about feeding options were selected.

resultsSix publications reporting 4 unique decision aid interventions were included. All the interventions targeted caregivers of older adults with advanced dementia. Three decision aids were culturally adapted from existing decision aids. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Framework were used in these 6 publications. Interventions aimed to improve decision making regarding tube feeding for caregivers through static delivery methods. Caregivers rated these decision aids as helpful and acceptable. Decisional conflict and knowledge of feeding options were the most common outcomes evaluated. Reduction in decisional conflict and increase in knowledge were consistently found among dementia caregivers, but no intervention effects were found on preferences for the use of tube feeding. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Decision aid interventions effectively improve decision-making regarding tube feeding among the target population. Cultural adaptation of an existing decision aid intervention is the main strategy. However, the lack of guidance of a cultural adaptation framework in this process may lead to difficulties explaining caregivers' behavioral changes. Moreover, merely providing information is not enough to change caregivers' preferences or behavior of use of tube feeding. A systematic approach to cultural adaptation and interactive intervention is needed in future studies.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaAgedDecision Support TechniquesHumansAdvanced dementiadecision aiddementia caregiversinterventionstube feeding

Identifiers

PMID36150408
PMCPMC10421649
OpenAlexW4296642733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.