Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36149864›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Effectiveness and safety of apixaban vs warfarin among venous thromboembolism patients at high-risk of bleeding.

Alexander T Cohen, Janvi Sah, Amol D Dhamane, Theodore Lee, Lisa Rosenblatt, Patrick Hlavacek, Birol Emir, Allison Keshishian, Huseyin Yuce, Xuemei Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Apixaban Use in Patients with Kidney Impairment: A Review of Pharmacokinetic, Interventional, and Observational Study Data.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander T CohenDepartment of Hematological Medicine, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9398-4621
Janvi SahSTATinMED, LLC, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Amol D DhamaneBristol Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, NJ, United States of America.
Theodore LeePfizer, New York, NY, United States of America.
Lisa RosenblattBristol Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, NJ, United States of America.
Patrick HlavacekPfizer, New York, NY, United States of America.
Birol EmirPfizer, New York, NY, United States of America.
Allison KeshishianSTATinMED, LLC, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Huseyin YuceNew York City College of Technology, City University of New York, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2946-6595
Xuemei LuoPfizer, Groton, CT, United States of America.
Pfizer (United States) · USBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USSTATinMED (United States) · USCity University of New York · USKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus warfarin among venous thromboembolism patients at high-risk of bleeding (defined as having at least one of the following bleeding risk factors: ≥75 years; used antiplatelet, NSAIDs, or corticosteroids; had prior gastrointestinal bleeding or gastrointestinal-related conditions; late stage chronic kidney disease). Adult venous thromboembolism patients initiating apixaban or warfarin with ≥1 bleeding risk factor were identified from Medicare and four commercial claims databases in the United States. To balance characteristics between apixaban and warfarin patients, stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting was conducted. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. In total, 88,281 patients were identified. After inverse probability treatment weighting, the baseline patient characteristics were well-balanced between the two cohorts. Among venous thromboembolism patients at high-risk of bleeding, apixaban was associated with significantly lower risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. No significant interactions were observed between treatment and number of risk factors on major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding or between treatment and type of bleeding risk factors on any of the outcomes. In conclusion, apixaban was associated with significantly lower risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding among venous thromboembolism patients at high-risk of bleeding. Effects were generally consistent across subgroups of patients with different number or type of bleeding risk factors.

Indexed as

Venous ThromboembolismWarfarinAdultAgedAnticoagulantsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalHemorrhageHumansMedicarePyrazolesPyridonesRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAnticoagulantsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalapixabanPyrazolesPyridonesWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID36149864
PMCPMC9506658
OpenAlexW4296797265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.