ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
Development of myopia in laser-treated ROP infants: prematurity or laser photocoagulation?
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review of Refractive Errors Post Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injection and Laser Photocoagulation Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the relationship between the development of corrected 1-year-old refraction values and risk factors in preterm infants who underwent laser photocoagulation (LPC) therapy for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
methodsThe ophthalmic examination findings of preterm neonates who had developed Type I ROP and received LPC therapy were evaluated retrospectively. The association between spherical equivalent (SE) values and clinical findings were analyzed by using multivariable linear regression analysis.
resultsThe study included 157 eyes of 80 neonates with a mean birth week of 27.1 ± 2.2 weeks (23 to 32 weeks) and a mean birth weight of 995 ± 273 g (565 to 1760 g). The treatments were administered on an average of 36.8 ± 2.7 (32 to 45 weeks) postmenstrual age. LPC treatment was applied bilaterally to 77 of the 80 neonates included in the study, and unilaterally to 3 of them. The mean ± standard deviation of the SE value was 0.31 ± 1.89 diopters (D) (- 8.00 to 4.63 D) according to the results of the 1-year corrected age refraction examination. In univariate analysis, no significant association between GA, BW, and ROP zone and SE value, while the number of laser spots (ß = - 0.27 ± 0.00 D, p = 0.00) and stage 3 ROP (ß = - 0.29 ± 0.37 D, p = 0.00) were significantly associated with the SE value. In multivariable linear regression analysis, a significant association between number of laser spot, stage 3 ROP and SE value (ß = - 0.25 ± 0.00 D, p = 0.01 for number of laser spot, ß = - 0.28 ± 0.36 D, p = 0.00 for stage 3 ROP).
conclusionIn conclusion, this study supports that stage of ROP and the number of laser spots count applied in photocoagulation treatment for ROP is significantly correlated with degree of myopia (p < 0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.