Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36149480›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatological research2023

Gender differences in isotretinoin prescriptions during the COVID-19 pandemic at a U.S. academic medical center.

Grace Y Duan, Arlene M Ruiz de Luzuriaga

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Grace Y DuanThe University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5881-3907
Arlene M Ruiz de LuzuriagaDepartment of Medicine, Section of Dermatology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC #5067, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. aruizde@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8318-4727
University of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic isotretinoin is a highly effective treatment for severe and refractory acne but carries risk for serious adverse effects such as teratogenicity. The risk mitigation system used in the United States, iPLEDGE, requires all patients on isotretinoin therapy to complete monthly tasks including follow-up visits with their prescriber, and patients with childbearing potential must additionally undergo monthly pregnancy testing. Female patients seeking isotretinoin are disproportionately affected by iPLEDGE-related barriers and have historically been prescribed isotretinoin less than male patients. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and updated regulations permitting at-home pregnancy testing and telehealth for monthly follow-up visits presented an opportunity to study the impact of these changes on the isotretinoin gender gap. We performed a single-center analysis to determine whether gender differences in isotretinoin prescription changed at our institution at the beginning of the pandemic. We found that male predominance of isotretinoin prescriptions was greater during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic (odds ratios: 4.13 vs. 2.86). Furthermore, male patients were more likely to utilize telehealth compared to in-person visits for isotretinoin follow-up relative to female patients (odds ratios: 6.00 vs. 3.62). Despite the newly introduced flexibilities of telehealth and remote pregnancy testing, gender inequity in receiving isotretinoin treatment persists.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisCOVID-19Dermatologic AgentsAcademic Medical CentersFemaleHumansIsotretinoinMalePandemicsPregnancyPrescriptionsSex FactorsUnited StatesDermatologic AgentsIsotretinoinAcneCOVID-19Gender disparitiesIsotretinoinTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID36149480
PMCPMC9510316
OpenAlexW4296800836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.