Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36149474›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2023

Spine injections: the rationale for CT guidance.

Sanja Bogdanovic, Reto Sutter, Veronika Zubler

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanja BogdanovicDepartment of Radiology, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. Sanja.Bogdanovic@balgrist.ch.
Reto SutterDepartment of Radiology, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Veronika ZublerDepartment of Radiology, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Universitätsklinik Balgrist · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Back pain is one of the most common medical problems and is associated with high socioeconomic costs. Imaging-guided spinal injections are a minimally invasive method to evaluate where the back pain is originating from, and to treat patients with radicular pain or spinal stenosis with infiltration of corticosteroids. CT-guided spine injections are a safe procedure, characterized by precise needle placement, excellent visualization of the relevant anatomical structures, and low radiation exposure for the patient and the interventional radiologist. In this review article, the variety of applications of CT-guided injections (focused on nerve roots and epidural injections) and the optimal injection procedure as well as risks and side effects are discussed.

Indexed as

Nerve BlockSpinal StenosisBack PainHumansInjections, EpiduralTomography, X-Ray ComputedCT-guided spine injectionsEpidural injectionNerve root blockSteroid injections

Identifiers

PMID36149474
PMCPMC10449983
OpenAlexW4296801635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.