Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36149448›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

Assessing the need for systematic biopsies in addition to targeted biopsies according to the characteristics of the index lesion at mpMRI. Results from a large, multi-institutional database.

Francesco Barletta, Elio Mazzone, Armando Stabile, Simone Scuderi, Giorgio Brembilla, Mario de Angelis, Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli, Vito Cucchiara, Giorgio Gandaglia, R Jeffrey Karnes and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesco BarlettaDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. barletta.francesco@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3585-3217
Elio MazzoneDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Armando StabileDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Simone ScuderiDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio BrembillaDepartment of Radiology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Mario de AngelisDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe Ottone CirulliDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Vito CucchiaraDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio GandagliaDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
R Jeffrey KarnesDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Morgan RoupretUrology, GRC No 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Francesco De CobelliDepartment of Radiology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BrigantiDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITMayo Clinic in Arizona · USSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe hypothesized that systematic biopsies (SBx) value for clinically significant PCa (csPCa) detection, in addition to mpMRI targeted biopsies (TBx), may vary significantly according to mpMRI index lesion (IL) characteristics.

methodsWe identified 1350 men with an mpMRI suspicious lesion (PI-RADS ≥ 3), defined as IL, who underwent TBx and SBx at three referral centres. The outcome was SBx added value in csPCa (grade group ≥ 2 PCa detected at SBx and missed by TBx) detection. To this aim, we performed multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVA). Furthermore, we explored the interaction between IL volume and SBx csPCa added value, across different PI-RADS categories, using lowess function.

resultsOverall, 569 (42%) men had csPCa at TBx and 78 (6%) csPCa were identified at SBx only. At MVA PSA (OR 0.90; p < 0.05) and IL volume (OR 0.58; p < 0.05) were associated with SBx csPCa added value. At interaction analyses, a nonlinear correlation between PI-RADS and SBx csPCa added value was identified with a decrease from roughly 10 to 4% followed by a substantial plateau at 1.2 ml and 0.6 ml for PI-RADS 3 and 4, respectively. For PI-RADS 5 lesions SBx csPCa added was constantly lower than 4%.

conclusionsIncreasing IL volume in PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions is associated with reduction in SBx csPCa added value. For diagnostic purposes, SBx could be omitted in men with IL larger than 1.2 ml and 0.6 ml for PI-RADS 3 and 4, respectively. Conversely, for PI-RADS 5, SBx csPCa added value was minimal regardless of IL volume.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRetrospective StudiesBiopsyDiagnosisMRIProstate cancerTargeted biopsy

Identifiers

PMID36149448
OpenAlexW4296804102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.