ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2022
[Relevance of clonal hematopoiesis for cellular therapies].
Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in patients with hematologic neoplasms who are undergoing a cellular therapy is common. The most frequently used cellular therapy procedures include autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and, more recently, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‑cell therapy. All three procedures differ fundamentally in terms of harvesting and manufacturing aspects as well as usage of the respective cell product. Therefore, the importance of CH in relation to the respective treatment method must be evaluated and assessed differently. In autologous HSCT, the extent of previous cytotoxic therapy significantly contributes to the high prevalence of CH. The clinically most important aspect is the development of secondary neoplasms from a pre-existing CH clone and the potential risk for enhanced cardiovascular side effects. In allogeneic HSCT, the donor selection with respect to the age largely determines the probability for the presence of CH. In this setting, the development of secondary malignancies only plays a minor role compared to the autologous HSCT. In fact, the induction of a graft versus host (GvH) or a graft versus leukemia (GvL) effect and its influence on progression-free and overall survival seem to be of possible clinical relevance. The CAR T‑cell therapy is closely linked to inflammatory reactions regarding its mode of action and the associated side effects. In this context CH might be closely linked to the effectiveness and side effects of the CAR T‑cell therapy. Initial data reported a high prevalence of CH in patients before CAR T‑cell therapy and indicated an increased rate of inflammatory side effects, although no negative effect on survival has yet been demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.