Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36149438›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2023

Proton and carbon ion beam treatment with active raster scanning method in 147 patients with skull base chordoma at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center-a single-center experience.

Matthias Mattke, Matteo Ohlinger, Nina Bougatf, Semi Harrabi, Robert Wolf, Katharina Seidensaal, Thomas Welzel, Falk Röder, Sabine Gerum, Malte Ellerbrock and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Robust IMPT and follow-up toxicity in skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma-a single-institution clinical experience.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Current topics and management of head and neck sarcomas.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias MattkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, SALK, Salzburg, Austria. m.mattke@salk.at.ORCID 0000-0001-5057-6065
Matteo OhlingerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nina BougatfDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Semi HarrabiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Robert WolfDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katharina SeidensaalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas WelzelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Falk RöderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, SALK, Salzburg, Austria.
Sabine GerumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, SALK, Salzburg, Austria.
Malte EllerbrockHeidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
Oliver JäkelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas HabererHeidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus HerfarthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias UhlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ludwigshafen Hospital, Bremserstr. 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Jürgen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEParacelsus Medical University · ATKlinikum Ludwigshafen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to compare the results of irradiation with protons versus irradiation with carbon ions in a raster scan technique in patients with skull base chordomas and to identify risk factors that may compromise treatment results.

methodsA total of 147 patients (85 men, 62 women) were irradiated with carbon ions (111 patients) or protons (36 patients) with a median dose of 66 Gy (RBE (Relative biological effectiveness); carbon ions) in 4 weeks or 74 Gy (RBE; protons) in 7 weeks at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) in Heidelberg, Germany. The median follow-up time was 49.3 months. All patients had gross residual disease at the beginning of RT. Compression of the brainstem was present in 38%, contact without compression in 18%, and no contact but less than 3 mm distance in 16%. Local control and overall survival were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier Method based on scheduled treatment (protons vs. carbon ions) and compared via the log rank test. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify possible prognostic factors.

resultsDuring the follow-up, 41 patients (27.9%) developed a local recurrence. The median follow-up time was 49.3 months (95% CI: 40.8-53.8; reverse Kaplan-Meier median follow-up time 56.3 months, 95% CI: 51.9-60.7). No significant differences between protons and carbon ions were observed regarding LC, OS, or overall toxicity. The 1‑year, 3‑year, and 5‑year LC rates were 97%, 80%, and 61% (protons) and 96%, 80%, and 65% (carbon ions), respectively. The corresponding OS rates were 100%, 92%, and 92% (protons) and 99%, 91%, and 83% (carbon ions). No significant prognostic factors for LC or OS could be determined regarding the whole cohort; however, a significantly improved LC could be observed if the tumor was > 3 mm distant from the brainstem in patients presenting in a primary situation.

conclusionOutcomes of proton and carbon ion treatment of skull base chordomas seem similar regarding tumor control, survival, and toxicity. Close proximity to the brainstem might be a negative prognostic factor, at least in patients presenting in a primary situation.

Indexed as

ChondrosarcomaChordomaHead and Neck NeoplasmsHeavy Ion RadiotherapyProton TherapySkull Base NeoplasmsCarbonFemaleHumansIonsMaleProtonsSkull BaseCarbonIonsProtonsBragg peakC12Heavy ionHigh LETNotochordal sarcomaParticle therapy

Identifiers

PMID36149438
PMCPMC9876873
OpenAlexW4296793853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.