Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36149022›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2023

Viscoelastic Properties of Bioprinted Alginate Microbeads Compared to Their Bulk Hydrogel Analogs.

Cassandra L Roberge, David M Kingsley, Lexie R Cornely, Connor J Spain, Aiyana G Fortin, David T Corr

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cassandra L RobergeBiomedical Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 Eighth Street, Troy, NY 12180.
David M KingsleyBiomedical Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 Eighth Street, Troy, NY 12180.
Lexie R CornelyBiomedical Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 Eighth Street, Troy, NY 12180.
Connor J SpainRensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Biomedical Engineering Department, 110 Eighth Street, Troy, NY 12180.
Aiyana G FortinBiomedical Engineering Department, University of Vermont, 590 Main Street, Burlington, VT 05401.
David T CorrBiomedical Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 Eighth Street, Troy, NY 12180.
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

Role of tumor heterogeneity on receptor engagementR01CA207725 · NCI · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI BARROSO, MARGARIDA, CORR, DAVID THOMAS · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
In vivo Macroscopic Fluorescence Lifetime Molecular Optical ImagingR01CA250636 · NCI · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI BARROSO, MARGARIDA, INTES, XAVIER · 2020 to 2023
$2.9M
Endosome-mitochondria interactions in breast cancer cellsR01CA233188 · NCI · ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI BARROSO, MARGARIDA · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207725NCI NIH HHS R01 CA233188NCI NIH HHS R01 CA250636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrogel microbeads are engineered spherical microgels widely used for biomedical applications in cell cultures, tissue engineering, and drug delivery. Their mechanical and physical properties (i.e., modulus, porosity, diffusion) heavily influence their utility by affecting encapsulated cellular behavior, biopayload elution kinetics, and stability for longer term cultures. There is a need to quantify these properties to guide microbead design for effective application. However, there are few techniques with the μN-level resolution required to evaluate these relatively small, compliant constructs. To circumvent mechanically testing individual microbeads, researchers often approximate microbead properties by characterizing larger bulk gel analogs of the same material formulation. This approach provides some insight into the hydrogel properties. However, bulk gels possess key structural and mechanical differences compared to their microbead equivalents, which may limit their accuracy and utility as analogs for estimating microbead properties. Herein, we explore how microbead properties are influenced by hydrogel formulation (i.e., alginate concentration, divalent cation crosslinker, and crosslinker concentration), and whether these trends are accurately reflected in bulk gel analogs. To accomplish this, we utilize laser direct-write bioprinting to create 12 × 12 arrays of alginate microbeads and characterize all 144 microbeads in parallel using a commercially available microcompression system. In this way, the compressive load is distributed across a large number of beads, thus amplifying sample signal. Comparing microbead properties to those of their bulk gel analogs, we found that their trends in modulus, porosity, and diffusion with hydrogel formulation are consistent, yet bulk gels exhibit significant discrepancies in their measured values.

Indexed as

AlginatesBioprintingHydrogelsMicrospheresTissue EngineeringAlginatesHydrogelsbulk gelhydrogellaser direct-write bioprintingmicrobeadmicrocompression

Identifiers

PMID36149022
PMCPMC9791675
OpenAlexW4296801973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.