Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36148965›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)

Community cohesion and violence against women in Ghana, Pakistan, and South Sudan: A secondary data analysis.

Sébastien Poix, Nuha Ibrahim, Stacey Scriver, Srinivas Raghavendra, Nata Duvvury, Khalifa Elmusharaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sébastien PoixSchool of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8509-2447
Nuha IbrahimSchool of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Stacey ScriverCentre for Global Women's Studies, School of Political Science and Sociology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Srinivas RaghavendraDiscipline of Economics, J.E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Nata DuvvuryCentre for Global Women's Studies, School of Political Science and Sociology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6616-808X
Khalifa ElmusharafSchool of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8652-1867

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuch knowledge has been accumulated on individual-level risks and protective factors of violence against women. However, the influence of factors operating at the community level, such as community cohesion, remains unclear, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This study examined whether community cohesion, a combined measure of mutual trust and tolerance, affects women's likelihood of experiencing intimate partner violence, violence perpetrated by a family member, and violence occurring in public spaces.

methodsData on 4785 women aged between 18 and 60 years in Ghana, Pakistan, and South Sudan, initially collected by the 'What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls' Research and Innovation Programme, were used for this study. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between a composite measure of community cohesion and recent experience of physical, sexual, and psychological violence while controlling for different individual-, community-, and state-level variables.

resultsMultivariate analyses revealed that community cohesion was associated with lower risks of public spaces violence (adjusted odds ratio = 0.396, 95% confidence interval = 0.312-0.503, P < 0.001) and family member violence (adjusted odds ratio = 0.839, 95% confidence interval = 0.754-0.934, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant association between intimate partner violence and community cohesion, but adjusted models showed that women with more developed social networks were at higher risks of experiencing intimate partner violence (adjusted odds ratio = 1.104, 95% confidence interval = 1.062-1.148, P < 0.001).

conclusionOur findings suggest that community cohesion may have a protective effect against the most visible forms of violence against women. However, this effect may be attenuated or even eliminated by other individual- or household-level mechanisms in the case of violence between intimates or family members.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisDomestic ViolenceAdolescentAdultFemaleGhanaHumansMiddle AgedPakistanPrevalenceRisk FactorsSouth SudanYoung Adultcommunity cohesionfamily member violenceintimate partner violencepublic spaces violencesocial cohesionviolence against women

Identifiers

PMID36148965
PMCPMC9511548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.