Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36148938›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)

Preconception cannabis use: An important but overlooked public health issue.

Kara R Skelton, Kelly C Young-Wolff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kara R SkeltonDepartment of Health Sciences, College of Health Professions, Towson University, Towson, MD, USA.
Kelly C Young-WolffDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6177-534X

Funding

Identifying Risk Factors for Prenatal Substance and Polysubstance UseK01DA043604 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI YOUNG-WOLFF, KELLY CORINNE · 2017 to 2021
$907k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA043604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis is the most commonly used federally illicit drug among pregnant women in the United States, and the prevalence and frequency of prenatal cannabis use are increasing. The preconception period - typically thought of as the 3-12 months immediately preceding pregnancy - is a distinct and critical period for women's health that has often been overlooked when examining prenatal cannabis use. Given that substance use behaviors typically develop before pregnancy, and risk factors associated with prenatal cannabis use are often present prior to conception, preventive approaches to addressing prenatal cannabis use would benefit from focusing on women who use cannabis prior to pregnancy. In order to ensure preconception cannabis use is brought to the forefront of cannabis prevention efforts, we recommend additional research, patient education, and clinician training focused on preconception cannabis use.

Indexed as

CannabisIllicit DrugsFemaleHumansPreconception CarePregnancyPregnant PeoplePublic HealthUnited StatesWomen's HealthIllicit Drugscliniciansmarijuanapregnancyprenatalwomen

Identifiers

PMID36148938
PMCPMC9510968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.