Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36148705›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2022

Domain generalization for prostate segmentation in transrectal ultrasound images: A multi-center study.

Sulaiman Vesal, Iani Gayo, Indrani Bhattacharya, Shyam Natarajan, Leonard S Marks, Dean C Barratt, Richard E Fan, Yipeng Hu, Geoffrey A Sonn, Mirabela Rusu

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sulaiman VesalDepartment of Urology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: svesal@stanford.edu.
Iani GayoCentre for Medical Image Computing, Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional & Surgical Sciences, and Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, 66-72 Gower St, London WC1E 6EA, UK.
Indrani BhattacharyaDepartment of Urology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Shyam NatarajanDepartment of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, 200 Medical Plaza Driveway, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Leonard S MarksDepartment of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, 200 Medical Plaza Driveway, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Dean C BarrattCentre for Medical Image Computing, Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional & Surgical Sciences, and Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, 66-72 Gower St, London WC1E 6EA, UK.
Richard E FanDepartment of Urology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Yipeng HuCentre for Medical Image Computing, Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional & Surgical Sciences, and Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, 66-72 Gower St, London WC1E 6EA, UK.
Geoffrey A SonnDepartment of Urology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Mirabela RusuDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: mirabela.rusu@stanford.edu.

Funding

Rad-pathomic deep learning models to assist radiologists in differentiating aggressive from indolent prostate cancer on MRIR37CA260346 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mirabela Rusu · 2022 to 2026
$2.8M
Cancer Research UK 31378NCI NIH HHS R37 CA260346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate biopsy and image-guided treatment procedures are often performed under the guidance of ultrasound fused with magnetic resonance images (MRI). Accurate image fusion relies on accurate segmentation of the prostate on ultrasound images. Yet, the reduced signal-to-noise ratio and artifacts (e.g., speckle and shadowing) in ultrasound images limit the performance of automated prostate segmentation techniques and generalizing these methods to new image domains is inherently difficult. In this study, we address these challenges by introducing a novel 2.5D deep neural network for prostate segmentation on ultrasound images. Our approach addresses the limitations of transfer learning and finetuning methods (i.e., drop in performance on the original training data when the model weights are updated) by combining a supervised domain adaptation technique and a knowledge distillation loss. The knowledge distillation loss allows the preservation of previously learned knowledge and reduces the performance drop after model finetuning on new datasets. Furthermore, our approach relies on an attention module that considers model feature positioning information to improve the segmentation accuracy. We trained our model on 764 subjects from one institution and finetuned our model using only ten subjects from subsequent institutions. We analyzed the performance of our method on three large datasets encompassing 2067 subjects from three different institutions. Our method achieved an average Dice Similarity Coefficient (Dice) of 94.0±0.03 and Hausdorff Distance (HD95) of 2.28 mm in an independent set of subjects from the first institution. Moreover, our model generalized well in the studies from the other two institutions (Dice: 91.0±0.03; HD95: 3.7 mm and Dice: 82.0±0.03; HD95: 7.1 mm). We introduced an approach that successfully segmented the prostate on ultrasound images in a multi-center study, suggesting its clinical potential to facilitate the accurate fusion of ultrasound and MRI images to drive biopsy and image-guided treatments.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerProstateHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePelvisUltrasonographyContinual learning segmentationDeep learningGland segmentationProstate MRITargeted biopsyTransrectal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36148705
PMCPMC10161676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.