Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36148578›Full record

Trial reportGut and liver2023

Four-Hour Fasting for Semifluids and 2-Hour Fasting for Water Improves the Patient Experience of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Meng-Xi Cai, Ye Gao, Li Li, Wen Feng, Yi-Lin Wang, Zhao-Shen Li, Lei Xin, Luo-Wei Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut and liver, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Chronic Atrophic Gastritis and Intestinal Metaplasia: A Latin American Perspective.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024
    Review
  4. Compilation and evaluation of gastrointestinal endoscopy satisfaction scale.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meng-Xi CaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4956-4128
Ye GaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6338-9602
Li LiDigestive Endoscopy Center, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6756-8109
Wen FengDigestive Endoscopy Center, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9253-4434
Yi-Lin WangGeorgetown Preparatory School, North Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2496-8417
Zhao-Shen LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6294-7721
Lei XinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8861-5055
Luo-Wei WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6647-786X
Second Military Medical University · CNSouthwest Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: We aimed to investigate the comfort, safety, and endoscopic visibility during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) afforded by a modified 4-hour semifluid and 2-hour water ("4+2") fasting protocol. Methods: In this parallel group, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial, outpatients undergoing unsedated diagnostic EGD from 10:30 AM to 12:00 PM were randomly assigned to either a "4+2" protocol group or a conventional fasting group. The participants' comfort during the fasting period and procedure was measured using the visual analog scale, and mucosal visibility was measured by endoscopists using the total visibility score. Satisfaction was defined as a visual analog scale score of ≤3. The primary outcome was the participants' comfort during fasting. Results: One hundred and six and 108 participants were randomized to the "4+2" protocol and control groups, respectively. Participants' comfort before EGD was significantly higher in the "4+2" protocol group measured by both the proportion of satisfaction (86.8% vs 63.9%, p=0.002) and the visual analog scale score (median [interquartile range]: 1.0 [1.0-2.0] vs 3.0 [1.0-4.0], p<0.001). The proportion of satisfaction during EGD also significantly improved (59.4% vs 45.4%, p=0.039) in the "4+2" protocol group. The total visibility score was unaffected by the fasting protocol (5.0 [4.0-5.0] vs 4.0 [4.0-5.0], p=0.266). No adverse events were observed during the study. Conclusions: The "4+2" protocol was more comfortable and provided equal mucosal visibility and safety compared with conventional fasting for unsedated EGD.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, Digestive SystemFastingHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentProcedural SedationEsophagogastroduodenoscopyFastingPatient comfortQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID36148578
PMCPMC10191792
OpenAlexW4296794137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.