Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36148522›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

Exploring mental health clients' current medication knowledge, beliefs and experience with healthcare providers in the community in South Australia.

Tien Ngoc Thi Bui, Elizabeth Hotham, Mark Loughhead, Sara S McMillan, Nicholas Procter, Kessie Poole, Vijayaprakash Suppiah

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Supported Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Evidence on the Outcomes for People With Mental Ill Health.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Supported decision-making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tien Ngoc Thi BuiUniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6126-9298
Elizabeth HothamUniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5228-7312
Mark LoughheadUniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3610-1482
Sara S McMillanQuality Use of Medicines Network, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3427-4467
Nicholas ProcterUniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7289-3165
Kessie PooleSub-Acute Services, Mind Australia Limited, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Vijayaprakash SuppiahUniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5496-935X
University of South Australia · AUGriffith University · AUMind Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Australia, mental illness has been recognised as a National Health Priority area, with the coronavirus pandemic adding a layer of urgency to the need to address the multiple health problems faced by clients with mental illnesses. Whilst much has been done in efforts to support these clients, little is known about their medication knowledge and experience with health professionals. The aim of the study was to explore the knowledge and beliefs of clients on the use of psychotropic medications and study their experiences with healthcare providers. Adult participants at a not-for-profit community-managed specialist mental health service provider in Adelaide, South Australia were recruited. Four focus group sessions were conducted between February 2020 and March 2021. All sessions were co-facilitated by a peer practitioner with lived experience. Sessions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Participants (n = 27) reported that provision of medication education was inadequate and, in some cases, non-existent. There was an apparent lack of support for monitoring and managing common side effects, such as weight gain. Participants described not being involved in any decision-making processes and that establishing and maintaining a therapeutic relationship with their healthcare providers was challenging. Perceived stigma remains a barrier in accessing healthcare. Despite participants regularly interacting with a range of healthcare providers, findings highlight key gaps in care, particularly medication education and establishing a therapeutic relationship with their healthcare providers. Future mental health reforms should consider the provision of additional medication education in community settings, such as at not-for-profit organisations. Moreover, healthcare providers should take a proactive approach in establishing therapeutic relationships.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdultHealth PersonnelHumansMental HealthSouth Australiacommunity healthmedication counsellingmedication knowledgemental disordersmental healthshared decision makingtherapeutic relationship

Identifiers

PMID36148522
PMCPMC10086827
OpenAlexW4296794082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.