ArticleResuscitation plus2022
The PAWPER tape as a tool for rapid weight assessment in a Paediatric Emergency Department: Validation study and comparison with parents' estimation and Broselow tape.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pragmatic weight estimation for dosing of a new paediatric treatment for schistosomiasis prevention and control in preschool-aged children: a feasibility study in Uganda and Côte d'Ivoire.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2026Observational
- Multicentre validation of paediatric weight estimation methods in Indonesian children: a comparison of length-based, habitus-adjusted and age-based approaches.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Validation of the Pediatric Advanced Weight Prediction in the Emergency Room Extra Large Mid-Arm Circumference scale in Turkish children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence for weight estimation in paediatric emergency care.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Cat owners do not provide more reliable weight estimates for cats compared with veterinary professionals in an emergency setting.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To validate the PAWPER tape and assess its inter-observer reliability in children accessing a Paediatric Emergency Department (PED). As secondary outcome we compared the accuracy of the PAWPER tape with that of parents' estimation, the Broselow tape and the European Paediatric Life Support (EPLS) formula. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of children (0-12 years) enrolled in a tertiary Paediatric Emergency Department in Italy. Children's weight was estimated by parents and by trained healthcare providers using the PAWPER tape, the Broselow tape and the EPLS formula. The root mean squared percentage error (RMSPE) for the estimation of precision was calculated. Overall accuracy was evaluated using the percentage of weight estimation falling within 10% (PW10) and 20% (PW20) of real weight. Results: The study included 2060 children. Parental estimation was the most accurate and precise method. The PAWPER tape was accurate throughout all habitus sizes except for extreme underweight and overweight categories. Furthermore, it was more accurate and more precise than the Broselow tape and the EPLS formula ( Conclusions: The PAWPER tape served as an accurate method for weight estimation in children accessing a Paediatric Emergency Department, with excellent inter-rater reliability. It performed significantly better than other length or age-based tools, showing good accuracy and precision except for very extreme weights. Whilst parents' estimation yielded to be the most accurate and precise method, the age-based EPLS formula was not reliable for estimating weight in all subcategories of habitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.