Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36148425›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Optimization of Residential Landscape Design and Supply Chain System Using Intelligent Fuzzy Cognitive Map and Genetic Algorithm.

Tingyin Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tingyin DengSichuan University of Science & Engineering, Zigong, Sichuan 643000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4148-2897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work intends to optimize residential landscape design and Supply Chain (SC) network systems. First, Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) intelligent assistance and genetic algorithm (GA) are used to study residential landscape design and its integration with SC deeply. Weight matrix interactions are employed to implement iterative inference for FCM. The functions are transformed to unify variables of different scopes. Subsequently, a weighting method is proposed to deal with the disadvantage of the simple average method being too general. In addition, the Hebbian learning algorithm is used to adjust the state nodes and the connection weights. Finally, according to the fitness function of the GA and logistic regression (LR) model, residential landscape design and SC are combined. The simulation experiment results show that the causal relationship analysis between SC networks under fuzzy cognition shows that the state errors of each specific situation are 0.21, 0.16, and 0.24, respectively. The total average error is 0.21 in the case of multiple iterations. The average error of the result vector under fuzzy cognition and the operation of the actual result is 0.20, 0.15, and 0.24, respectively, and the error value is much reduced. The simulation accuracy of the GA-LR method for residential landscape design is improved from 77% to 84.7%. The "kappa coefficient" is also improved to 82.3%. The conclusion shows that the weight matrix is used to analyze the high-quality performance of landscape design according to the specific situation of SC. For each specific case, FCM is effective in reducing errors over multiple iterations. Under the GA-LR method, fewer geographic location types and larger accuracy deviations can improve the simulation accuracy.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFuzzy LogicCognitionComputer SimulationIntelligence

Identifiers

PMID36148425
PMCPMC9489344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.