ArticlePsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law2022
Developing and piloting the Consumer Experience of Capacity Assessment Tool (CECAT).
Article in Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autonomy in personal decision-making (DM) is a fundamental human right. Yet, DM can be impaired for many reasons, including poor health. If impairments are suspected, they may be formally investigated via a capacity assessment. The 'consumer' experience of such assessments is largely unexplored. The Consumer Experience of Capacity Assessment Tool (CECAT) was developed to address this gap. Fifteen individuals pilot tested the CECAT. The CECAT was found to be quick to complete, and easily understood. The results showed a wide range of perceptions about capacity assessment and suggestions for improvement (e.g., better communication to consumers about what to expect). With further development, the CECAT could be adopted as a standardised method for understanding the consumer experience of capacity assessment. This perspective could then be integrated into future capacity assessment guidelines so that appropriate human rights-based approaches are incorporated into capacity assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.