ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology
Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) are significant contributors to cancer-related mortality. In this single-arm, retrospective cohort study, we aimed to examine the outcomes of a radioimmunotherapeutic modality, Methods and Materials: We conducted this study based on data from the United Arab Emirates lymphoma registry. All patients with NHL subjected to Results: Between 2004 and 2008, 54 of 111 patients with B-cell NHL received radioimmunotherapy. The therapy was applied as first-line treatment in 18 cases (33.3%) and second- or later-line treatment in 36 cases (66.7%). All patients were evaluable for response. The first-line group consisted mainly of follicular lymphoma cases, and 3 of 18 patients died (16.7%) during the follow-up (range, 22-67 months). Median OS was not reached. No progression occurred after treatment (median EFS, 36.5 months [Q Conclusions: The findings suggest that patients with NHL may benefit from
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.