Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36148288›Full record

ArticlePediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition2022

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Children: Feasibility, Success, and Safety with Standard Adult Endoscopes and Accessories.

Kasadoruge Dinesh Rangika Perera, Nawarathne Mudiyanselage Metthananda Nawarathne, Vajira Tharanga Samarawickrama, Malinda Peiris Deraniyagala, Wickramadurayala Gedara Eranda Luxman, Anthony Nilesh Ranjeev Fernandopulle

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Risk factors for pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kasadoruge Dinesh Rangika PereraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-4594
Nawarathne Mudiyanselage Metthananda NawarathneDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0098-4017
Vajira Tharanga SamarawickramaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9392-7678
Malinda Peiris DeraniyagalaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3841-5212
Wickramadurayala Gedara Eranda LuxmanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5477-2522
Anthony Nilesh Ranjeev FernandopulleDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2169-8394
National Hospital of Sri Lanka · LKUniversity of Colombo · LK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases in the pediatric population was not well defined until recently. Our aim was to determine the feasibility, outcomes, and safety of ERCP in a local pediatric population, particularly using standard adult endoscopes and accessories. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka. Pediatric patients (aged <16 years) who underwent ERCP from January 2015 to December 2020 were included in the study. Data, including patient demographics, indications for the procedure, technical details, and associated complications, were collected from the internal database and patient records maintained at the hospital. Results: The study included 62 patients who underwent a total of 98 ERCP procedures. All the procedures were performed by adult gastroenterologists using standard adult endoscopes and accessories. The mean age was 11.01±3.47 years. Pancreatic diseases were the major indications for most of the procedures (n=81, 82.7%), with chronic pancreatitis being the most common. Seventeen procedures (17.3%) were carried out for biliary diseases. Overall cannulation and technical success rates were 87.8% and 85.7%, respectively. Stent placement was the most common therapeutic intervention (n=66; 67.4%). Post-ERCP pancreatitis was the most common complication, occurring in eight patients (8.2%). Conclusion: ERCP can be successfully and safely performed in pediatric populations using standard adult endoscopes and accessories with complications similar to those of adults. Adult ERCP services can be offered to most pediatric patients without additional costs of pediatric endoscopes and accessories.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrogradeEndoscopyPancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID36148288
PMCPMC9482827
OpenAlexW4295940890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.