ArticleCJC open2022
Very Early Progression of an In-Stent Calcified Nodule 2 Weeks After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Calcified Lesion.
Article in CJC open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Rotational Atherectomy for Severely Calcified Lesions.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Deep dive into intravascular coronary imaging in calcified lesions.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2025Review
- Sailing in Dark Waters: The Challenging Management of Recurrent In-Stent Calcified Nodule Protrusion.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Late stent thrombosis six months after ultrathin-strut covered stent implantation in lesion with calcified nodule.Journal of cardiology cases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In-stent calcified nodules (CNs) are one of the mechanisms of in-stent restenosis, but their underlying cause has not been elucidated. We report a case of a patient with early stent thrombosis due to an in-stent CN only 2 weeks after drug-eluting stent implantation. The fact that the in-stent CN was detected only 2 weeks after the initial percutaneous coronary intervention means that the underlying mechanism was the progression of the CN, indicating that in-stent CNs can occur even in the subacute phase. After percutaneous coronary intervention for a severe calcified lesion, very early progression of CNs can occur, and they require close follow-up and intensive antiplatelet therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.