Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36148177›Full record

ArticleLe infezioni in medicina2022

Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcome in RT-PCR positive and false-negative RT-PCR for COVID-19: A Retrospective analysis.

Durga Shankar Meena, Bharat Kumar, Arjun Kachhwaha, Deepak Kumar, Satyendra Khichar, Gopal Krishana Bohra, Ankur Sharma, Nikhil Kothari, Pawan Garg, Binit Sureka and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Le infezioni in medicina, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Durga Shankar MeenaDepartment of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Bharat KumarDepartment of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Arjun KachhwahaDepartment of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Deepak KumarDepartment of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Satyendra KhicharDepartment of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Gopal Krishana BohraDepartment of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Ankur SharmaDepartment of Trauma and Emergency (Anaesthesiology), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Nikhil KothariDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Pawan GargDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Binit SurekaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Mithu BanerjeeDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Mahendra Kumar GargDepartment of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Sanjeev MisraAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cases with SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR negative pneumonia are an understudied group with uncertainty remaining regarding their treatment approach. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiological characteristics of RT-PCR positive and clinically diagnosed RT-PCR negative COVID-19. This was a single-centre retrospective study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Western India. All patients (age ≥18 years) with suspicion of COVID-19 with SARI (severe acute respiratory infections) who were subjected to RT-PCR testing (nasal/oropharyngeal swab) were included. Based on RTPCR results, patients were categorized and compared for demographic, clinical, and biochemical characteristics and outcomes. Out of 500 patients, 339 (67.8%) found RT-PCR positive. Except for the radiological findings, both groups differ in clinical presentation, disease severity (inflammatory markers), and outcome. RT-PCR-positive patients had raised ferritin, NLR (Neutrophil-Lymphocyte ratio), LDH, and high mortality compared to the swab-negative group. In-hospital mortality was also significantly high in RT-PCR positive group (HR=1.9, 95% CI=1.4-2.5, p=0.001). On multivariate analysis, NLR, ferritin, and d-dimer were the independent predictors of mortality in RT-PCR-positive (p=0.038, 0.054, and 0.023). At the same time, raised TLC (total leukocyte count) and procalcitonin were the risk factors for poor outcomes in RT-PCR-negative patients (p=0.041 and 0.038). We found significantly raised ferritin, NLR, and LDH levels and increased mortality in RT-PCR positive patients compared to RT-PCR negative. Incorporating clinical features, radiological, and biochemical parameters could be prudent while managing the RT-PCR-negative patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19CT-ThoraxpneumoniaRT-PCRSARI

Identifiers

PMID36148177
PMCPMC9448311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.