ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Source localization using virtual magnetoencephalography helmets: A simulation study toward a prior-based tailored scheme.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) source estimation of brain electromagnetic fields is an ill-posed problem. A virtual MEG helmet (VMH), can be constructed by recording in different head positions and then transforming the multiple head-MEG coordinates into one head frame (i.e., as though the MEG helmet was moving while the head remained static). The constructed VMH has sensors placed in various distances and angles, thus improving the spatial sampling of neuromagnetic fields. VMH has been previously shown to increase total information in comparison to a standard MEG helmet. The aim of this study was to examine whether VMH can improve source estimation accuracy. To this end, controlled simulations were carried out, in which the source characteristics are predefined. A series of VMHs were constructed by applying two or three translations and rotations to a standard 248 channel MEG array. In each simulation, the magnetic field generated by 1 to 5 dipoles was forward projected, alongside noise components. The results of this study showed that at low noise levels (e.g., averaged data of similar signals), VMHs can significantly improve the accuracy of source estimations, compared to the standard MEG array. Moreover, when utilizing a priori information, tailoring the constructed VMHs to specific sets of postulated neuronal sources can further improve the accuracy. This is shown to be a robust and stable method, even for proximate locations. Overall, VMH may add significant precision to MEG source estimation, for research and clinical benefits, such as in challenging epilepsy cases, aiding in surgical design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.