Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36148049›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

D-dimer, BNP/NT-pro-BNP, and creatinine are reliable decision-making biomarkers in life-sustaining therapies withholding and withdrawing during COVID-19 outbreak.

David M Smadja, Benjamin A Fellous, Guillaume Bonnet, Caroline Hauw-Berlemont, Willy Sutter, Agathe Beauvais, Charles Fauvel, Aurélien Philippe, Orianne Weizman, Delphine Mika and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

David M SmadjaUniversité de Paris-Cité, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, INSERM, Paris, France.
Benjamin A FellousUniversité de Paris-Cité, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, INSERM, Paris, France.
Guillaume BonnetUniversité de Paris, Paris Cardiovascular Research Centre (PARCC), INSERM, UMR-S970, Paris, France.
Caroline Hauw-BerlemontMedical Intensive Care Department AP-HP, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.
Willy SutterUniversité de Paris, Paris Cardiovascular Research Centre (PARCC), INSERM, UMR-S970, Paris, France.
Agathe BeauvaisUniversité de Paris-Cité, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, INSERM, Paris, France.
Charles FauvelRouen University Hospital, FHU REMOD-VHF, Rouen, France.
Aurélien PhilippeUniversité de Paris-Cité, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, INSERM, Paris, France.
Orianne WeizmanInstitut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, CHU de Nancy, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Delphine MikaUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inserm, UMR-S 1180, Chatenay-Malabry, France.
Philippe JuvinEmergency Department, AP-HP, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.
Victor WaldmannUniversité de Paris, Paris Cardiovascular Research Centre (PARCC), INSERM, UMR-S970, Paris, France.
Jean-Luc DiehlUniversité de Paris-Cité, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, INSERM, Paris, France.
Ariel CohenCardiology Department, AP-HP, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Richard ChocronUniversité de Paris, Paris Cardiovascular Research Centre (PARCC), INSERM, UMR-S970, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FRHôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque · FRHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRInstitut Jean Lamour · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The decision for withholding and withdrawing of life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) in COVID-19 patients is currently based on a collegial and mainly clinical assessment. In the context of a global pandemic and overwhelmed health system, the question of LST decision support for COVID-19 patients using prognostic biomarkers arises. Methods: In a multicenter study in 24 French hospitals, 2878 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in medical departments from 26 February to 20 April 2020 were included. In a propensity-matched population, we compared the clinical, biological, and management characteristics and survival of patients with and without LST decision using Student's Results: An LST was decided for 591 COVID-19 patients (20.5%). These 591 patients with LST decision were secondarily matched (1:1) based on age, sex, body mass index, and cancer history with 591 COVID-19 patients with no LST decision. The patients with LST decision had significantly more cardiovascular diseases, such as high blood pressure (72.9 vs. 66.7%, Conclusion: The concomitant increase in D-dimer, BNP/NT-proBNP, and creatinine during the admission of a COVID-19 patient could represent a reliable and helpful tool for LST decision. Circulating biomarker might potentially provide additional information for LST decision in COVID-19.

Indexed as

biomarkersclaeys-léonetti lawCOVID-19ethicslife-sustaining therapiesmortalitySARS-CoV-2withholding or withdrawing

Identifiers

PMID36148049
PMCPMC9485619
OpenAlexW4294751659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.