Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147904›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022

Predictive value of baseline metabolic tumor volume for non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-analysis.

Ke Zhu, Danqian Su, Jianing Wang, Zhouen Cheng, Yiqiao Chin, Luyin Chen, Chingtin Chan, Rongcai Zhang, Tianyu Gao, Xiaosong Ben and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Prognostic value of [BMC medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The utility ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Predictive performance of [Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ke ZhuDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Danqian SuDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianing WangDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhouen ChengDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Yiqiao ChinDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Luyin ChenDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Chingtin ChanDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Rongcai ZhangDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Tianyu GaoDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaosong BenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Chunxia JingDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a promising treatment option for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, highlighting the need for biomarkers to identify responders and predict the outcome of ICIs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of baseline standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) derived from 18F-FDG-PET/CT in advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs. Methods: PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched from January 1st, 2011 to July 18th, 2022, utilizing the search terms "non-small-cell lung cancer", "PET/CT", "standardized uptake value", "metabolic tumor volume", " total lesion glycolysis", and "immune checkpoint inhibitors". Studies that analyzed the association between PET/CT parameters and objective response, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and prognosis of NSCLC patients treated with ICIs were included. We extracted the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We performed a meta-analysis of HR using Review Manager v.5.4.1. Results: Sixteen studies were included for review and thirteen for meta-analysis covering 770 patients. As for objective response and irAEs after ICIs, more studies with consistent assessment methods are needed to determine their relationship with MTV. In the meta-analysis, low SUVmax corresponded to poor PFS with a pooled HR of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.57-0.96, P=0.02). And a high level of baseline MTV level was related to shorter PFS (HR=1.45, 95% CI, 1.11-1.89, P<0.01) and OS (HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.97-3.73, P<0.01) especially when the cut-off value was set between 50-100 cm Conclusions: High level of baseline MTV corresponded to shorter PFS and OS, especially when the cut-off value was set between 50-100 cm

Indexed as

immune checkpoint inhibitormetabolic tumor volumenon-small-cell lung cancerPET/CT (18)F-FDGstandardized uptake value

Identifiers

PMID36147904
PMCPMC9487526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.