Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147866›Full record

ArticleeNeurologicalSci2022

Discussing brain magnetic resonance imaging results for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy treated with hypothermia: A challenge for clinicians and parents.

Ariel Cascio, Amaryllis Ferrand, Eric Racine, Marie St-Hilaire, Priscille-Nice Sanon, Andreea Gorgos, Pia Wintermark

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ariel CascioCollege of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, USA.
Amaryllis FerrandPragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Montreal Clinical Research Institute, Montreal, Canada.
Eric RacinePragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Montreal Clinical Research Institute, Montreal, Canada.
Marie St-HilaireResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Priscille-Nice SanonResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Andreea GorgosDivision of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Pia WintermarkResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
McGill University Health Centre · CACentral Michigan University · USMcGill University · CAMontreal Children's Hospital · CAMontreal Clinical Research Institute · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Clinicians use brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to discuss neurodevelopmental prognosis with parents of neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) treated with therapeutic hypothermia (TH). Purpose: To investigate how clinicians and parents discuss these MRI results in the context of HIE and TH and how these discussions could be facilitated and more meaningful for parents. Procedures: Mixed-methods surveys with open-ended and closed-ended questions were completed by two independent groups. (1) Clinicians responded to clinical vignettes of neonates with HIE treated with TH with various types of clinical features, evolution and extent of brain injury and questions about how they discuss brain MRI results in this context. (2) Parents of children with HIE treated with TH responded to questions about the discussion of MRI that they had while still in the neonatal intensive care unit and were asked to place it in perspective with the outcomes of their child when he/she reached at least 2 years of age. Open-ended responses were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Closed-ended responses are presented descriptively. Results: Clinicians reported uncertainty, lack of confidence, and limitations when discussing brain MRI results in the context of HIE and TH. Brain MRI results were "usually" (53%) used in the prognostication discussion. When dealing with day-2 brain MRIs performed during TH, most clinicians (40%) assumed that the results of these early MRIs were only "sometimes" accurate and only used them "sometimes" (33%) to discuss prognosis; a majority of them (66%) would "always" repeat imaging at a later time-point to discuss prognosis. Parents also struggled with this uncertainty, but did not discuss limitations of MRI as often. Parents raised the importance of the setting where the discussion took place and the importance to inform them as quickly as possible. Clinicians identified strategies to improve these discussions, including interdisciplinary approach, formal training, and standardized approach to report brain MRI. Parents highlighted the importance of communication skills, the stress, the hope surrounding their situation, and the need to receive answers as soon as possible. The importance of showing the pictures or making representative drawing of the injury, but also highlighting the not-injured brain, was also highlighted by parents. Conclusions: Discussing brain MRI results for neonates with HIE treated with TH are challenging tasks for clinicians and daunting moments for parents.

Indexed as

Birth asphyxiaBrainClinicianHIE, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathyHypothermiaMagnetic resonance imagingMRI, magnetic resonance imagingNeonatal encephalopathyNeonateNICU, neonatal intensive care unitParentsTH, therapeutic hypothermia

Identifiers

PMID36147866
PMCPMC9485039
OpenAlexW4295221099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.