ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2022
First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03143153 (A Randomized Phase 3 Study of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Combined With Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin Versus Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin in Subjects With Unresectable Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic Previously Untreated Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Phase 3 Study of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Combined With Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin Versus Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin in Subjects With Unresectable Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic Previously Untreated Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer based on TNM stage: a Markov model.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness of cabozantinib versus placebo for advanced neuroendocrine tumors from crossover-adjusted analysis in the United States and China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Macrophage efferocytosis mediated by the TP63-RAC2 pathway promotes immunosuppressive remodeling in esophageal cancer.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first line chemotherapy for patients with unresectable advanced esophageal cancer in Japan.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: perspectives from the United States and China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: perspectives from the United States and China.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Article
- First-line treatment with zolbetuximab plus CAPOX for ClDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitorsTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Is Alpelisib Plus Fulvestrant Cost-Effective for Treating PIK3CA-Mutation, HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer in the USA?Clinical drug investigation · 2023Article
- Nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric, gastroesophageal junction, and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of elacestrant versus standard endocrine therapy for second-/third-line treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a US payer perspective.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness of analysis serplulimab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for PD-L1-positive advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of serplulimab plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus chemotherapy (NC) or ipilimumab Methods: A partitioned survival model was constructed from the perspective of the US third-party payers and Chinese healthcare system. Health states and transition probabilities were modeled based on the survival data from the CheckMate-648 clinical trial (NCT03143153). The time horizon for the model was 10 years. Only direct medical costs were considered. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Results: In the United States, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NI) led to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $155,159.82/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and $104,297.07/QALY gained in the overall population and in patients with tumor cell programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of ⩾1% (subgroup), respectively. The ICER for the subgroup was between the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold values of $100,000/QALY and $150,000/QALY, and the other case was higher than $150,000/QALY. NC led to an ICER of $518,062.85/QALY and $193,169.49/QALY gained in the overall population and the subgroup, respectively. Both ICERs were significantly higher than the WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY. In China, the ICERs for patients treated with the addition of nivolumab were >$90,000/QALY in all cases, significantly exceeding the WTP threshold of $37,654/QALY. Conclusions: NI is more cost-effective than NC or chemotherapy alone for treating advanced ESCC with PD-L1 expression ⩾1% in the United States. Chemotherapy alone is the only cost-effective option in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.