Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147830›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2022

The Impact of Outpatient Prenatal Care Visitor Restrictions on Pregnant Patients and Partners During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Christina Collart, Caitlin Craighead, Susannah Rose, Richard Frankel, Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds, Uma Perni, Edward K Chien, Marissa Coleridge, Angela Ranzini, Ruth M Farrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christina CollartSubspecialty Care for Women's Health, OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3035-5104
Caitlin CraigheadSubspecialty Care for Women's Health, OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Susannah RoseCenter for Patient Experience, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Richard FrankelDepartment of the Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Brownsyne Tucker EdmondsDepartment of OB/GYN, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Uma PerniSubspecialty Care for Women's Health, OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Edward K ChienSubspecialty Care for Women's Health, OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Marissa ColeridgeSubspecialty Care for Women's Health, OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Angela RanziniDepartment of OB/GYN, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Ruth M FarrellSubspecialty Care for Women's Health, OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, several health care facilities enacted visitor restrictions to help reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 among patients, front-line workers in health care systems, and communities. The impact and burden of policy updates on visitor restrictions put forth by the COVID-19 pandemic can be seen on patients and families, most often in the acute care setting and skilled nursing facilities. Yet, the effects of visitor restrictions in the prenatal care setting were unknown. We conducted a study to investigate the impact of these policies on pregnant patients who received outpatient prenatal care. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study to explore pregnant patients' experiences with prenatal health care delivery between May and July 2020. In-depth interviews were conducted with pregnant patients in the first and second trimester of pregnancy, who received their prenatal care at the onset of the pandemic in the United States. Results: Participants noted increased maternal concern, anxiety, and mental health concerns stemming from the lack of in-person partner support. They noted disappointment and lost experiences for the patient during pregnancy, seeking support from her partner during pregnancy, experiences felt to be critical for postpartum health and wellbeing. There was also concern about the negative impact of restrictions on prenatal care quality and experience. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the impact of visitor restrictions on patients' prenatal care experience and perception of health care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future public health strategies should be individualized to different patient populations addressing knowledge, health literacy, and socioeconomic status, and developed in conjunction with pregnant patients as key stakeholders in the delivery of prenatal health care.

Indexed as

COVID-19mental healthpatient experienceprenatal careshared decision-makingvisitor restriction

Identifiers

PMID36147830
PMCPMC9436262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.