Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147764›Full record

ArticleThe Neurohospitalist2022

An Ocular Chameleon.

Mohamed Shaffi, Nick Saad, Jennifer Arnold, Geoffrey Parker, Daniel Nguyen, Behzad Eftekhar

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The Neurohospitalist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed ShaffiDepartment of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6935-813X
Nick SaadDepartment of Ophthalmology, Marsden Eye Specialists, Parramatta, NSW, Australia.
Jennifer ArnoldDepartment of Ophthalmology, Marsden Eye Specialists, Parramatta, NSW, Australia.
Geoffrey ParkerDepartment of Radiology, Macquarie University Hospital, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
Daniel NguyenDepartment of Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
Behzad EftekharDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Macquarie University · AUNew South Wales Institute of Psychiatry · AUThe University of Notre Dame Australia · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients presenting with transient visual loss is common in emergency departments. Neurologists, ophthalmologists and emergency care physicians may be called upon to evaluate such patients. Monocular visual loss should be differentiated from the binocular involvement as the oetologies, investigations and management of such patients differ considerably. We report a case of monocular visual loss that involved predominantly one eye but affected the other side independently, albeit less frequently. A meticulous history, thorough general, neurological and ophthalmological examinations are necessary in such patients to identify the cause and to treat appropriately. Ocular ischemic syndrome (OIS) is due to chronic hypoperfusion of the structures supplied by ophthalmic artery leading to monocular visual loss. Stenosis of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery from a variety of causes is the main underlying mechanism. The first case of OIS was reported by Hedges in 1963 and the term was coined later by Barry and Magargal. Ocular ischemic syndrome is an important differential diagnosis to consider especially in older people and those with vascular risk factors. An overview of important differential diagnosis, clinical features and treatment of OIC are discussed in this article. A multidisciplinary team is optimal for the management of ocular ischemic syndrome.

Indexed as

cerebro-vascular interventionmonocular visual lossocular ischemic syndromeretinal migraine

Identifiers

PMID36147764
PMCPMC9485686
OpenAlexW4296801864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.