ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022
Mathematical model for the relationship between single-cell and bulk gene expression to clarify the interpretation of bulk gene expression data.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering Cell-Type-Specific Transcriptional Regulation in Tomato Leaves Through Ensemble Machine Learning and Single-Cell Transcriptomics.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Application of a mathematical model to clarify the statistical characteristics of a pan-tissue DNA methylation clock.GeroScience · 2024Article
- Characterizing the landscape of gene expression variance in humans.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Data-driven identification and classification of nonlinear aging patterns reveals the landscape of associations between DNA methylation and aging.Human genomics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferential expression analysis is a standard approach in molecular biology. For example, genes whose expression levels differ between diseased and non-diseased samples are considered to be associated with that disease. On the other hand, differential variability analysis focuses on the differences of the variances of gene expression between sample groups. Although differential variability is also known to capture biological information, its interpretation remains unclear and controversial. Recent single-cell analyses have revealed that differences between sample groups can affect gene expression in a cellular subset-specific manner or by altering the proportion of a particular cellular subset. The aim of this study is to clarify the interpretation of mean and variance of bulk gene expression data.
methodWe developed a mathematical model in which the bulk gene expression value is proportional to the mean value of the single-cell gene expression profile. Based on this model, we performed theoretical, simulated and real single-cell RNA-seq data analyses. RESULT AND
conclusionWe identified how differences in single-cell gene expression profiles affect the differences in the mean and the variance of bulk gene expression. It is shown that differential expression analysis of bulk expression data can overlook significant changes in gene expression at the single-cell level. Further, differential variability analysis capture the complex feature affected by different gene expression shifts for each subset, changes in the proportions of cellular subsets, and variation in single-cell distribution parameters among samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.