Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147663›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022

Accurate brain tumor detection using deep convolutional neural network.

Md Saikat Islam Khan, Anichur Rahman, Tanoy Debnath, Md Razaul Karim, Mostofa Kamal Nasir, Shahab S Band, Amir Mosavi, Iman Dehzangi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
28.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 352 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Spinal-QDCNN: advanced feature extraction for brain tumor detection using MRI images.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Md Saikat Islam KhanDepartment of CSE, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh.
Anichur RahmanDepartment of CSE, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh.
Tanoy DebnathDepartment of CSE, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh.
Md Razaul KarimDepartment of CSE, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh.
Mostofa Kamal NasirDepartment of CSE, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh.
Shahab S BandFuture Technology Research Center, College of Future, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123 University Road, Section 3, Douliou, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan.
Amir MosaviInstitute of Information Engineering, Automation and Mathematics, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Iman DehzangiCenter for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ 08102, USA.
Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University · BDGreen University of Bangladesh · BDNational Yunlin University of Science and Technology · TWObuda University · HURutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Dhaka · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection and Classification of a brain tumor is an important step to better understanding its mechanism. Magnetic Reasoning Imaging (MRI) is an experimental medical imaging technique that helps the radiologist find the tumor region. However, it is a time taking process and requires expertise to test the MRI images, manually. Nowadays, the advancement of Computer-assisted Diagnosis (CAD), machine learning, and deep learning in specific allow the radiologist to more reliably identify brain tumors. The traditional machine learning methods used to tackle this problem require a handcrafted feature for classification purposes. Whereas deep learning methods can be designed in a way to not require any handcrafted feature extraction while achieving accurate classification results. This paper proposes two deep learning models to identify both binary (normal and abnormal) and multiclass (meningioma, glioma, and pituitary) brain tumors. We use two publicly available datasets that include 3064 and 152 MRI images, respectively. To build our models, we first apply a 23-layers convolution neural network (CNN) to the first dataset since there is a large number of MRI images for the training purpose. However, when dealing with limited volumes of data, which is the case in the second dataset, our proposed "23-layers CNN" architecture faces overfitting problem. To address this issue, we use transfer learning and combine VGG16 architecture along with the reflection of our proposed "23 layers CNN" architecture. Finally, we compare our proposed models with those reported in the literature. Our experimental results indicate that our models achieve up to 97.8% and 100% classification accuracy for our employed datasets, respectively, exceeding all other state-of-the-art models. Our proposed models, employed datasets, and all the source codes are publicly available at: (https://github.com/saikat15010/Brain-Tumor-Detection).

Indexed as

Brain tumorComputer-assisted diagnosisConvolutional neural networkData augmentationMagnetic reasoning imaging

Identifiers

PMID36147663
PMCPMC9468505
OpenAlexW4293340419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.