Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147628›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

He-Li Xu, Ting-Ting Gong, Fang-Hua Liu, Hong-Yu Chen, Qian Xiao, Yang Hou, Ying Huang, Hong-Zan Sun, Yu Shi, Song Gao and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Gynecologic Oncology Education: Insights from a Qualitative Study Using Semi-Structured Interviews.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

He-Li XuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Ting-Ting GongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Fang-Hua LiuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Hong-Yu ChenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Qian XiaoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yang HouDepartment of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Ying HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Hong-Zan SunDepartment of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yu ShiDepartment of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Song GaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yan LouDepartment of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, China.
Qing ChangDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yu-Hong ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Qing-Lei GaoNational Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Centre (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education) and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Qi-Jun WuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate identification of ovarian cancer (OC) is of paramount importance in clinical treatment success. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a potentially reliable assistant for the medical imaging recognition. We systematically review articles on the diagnostic performance of AI in OC from medical imaging for the first time. Methods: The Medline, Embase, IEEE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library databases were searched for related studies published until August 1, 2022. Inclusion criteria were studies that developed or used AI algorithms in the diagnosis of OC from medical images. The binary diagnostic accuracy data were extracted to derive the outcomes of interest: sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and Area Under the Curve (AUC). The study was registered with the PROSPERO, CRD42022324611. Findings: Thirty-four eligible studies were identified, of which twenty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis with a pooled SE of 88% (95%CI: 85-90%), SP of 85% (82-88%), and AUC of 0.93 (0.91-0.95). Analysis for different algorithms revealed a pooled SE of 89% (85-92%) and SP of 88% (82-92%) for machine learning; and a pooled SE of 88% (84-91%) and SP of 84% (80-87%) for deep learning. Acceptable diagnostic performance was demonstrated in subgroup analyses stratified by imaging modalities (Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, or Computed Tomography), sample size (≤300 or >300), AI algorithms versus clinicians, year of publication (before or after 2020), geographical distribution (Asia or non Asia), and the different risk of bias levels (≥3 domain low risk or < 3 domain low risk). Interpretation: AI algorithms exhibited favorable performance for the diagnosis of OC through medical imaging. More rigorous reporting standards that address specific challenges of AI research could improve future studies. Funding: This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82073647 to Q-JW and No. 82103914 to T-TG), LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (No. XLYC1907102 to Q-JW), and 345 Talent Project of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University (No. M0268 to Q-JW and No. M0952 to T-TG).

Indexed as

AI, Artificial intelligenceArtificial intelligenceAUC, Area Under the CurveCT, Computed TomographyDL, Deep learningMedical imagingMeta-analysisML, Machine learningMRI, Magnetic Resonance ImagingOC, Ovarian cancerOvarian cancerSE, SensitivitySP, SpecificityUS, UltrasoundXAI, Explainable artificial intelligence

Identifiers

PMID36147628
PMCPMC9486055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.