ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022
Artificial intelligence performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian pathophysiology and management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Differentiation Between Uveal Melanoma and Nevus Based on Fundus Photographs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Applied to Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pelvic Gynecological Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2026Pooled it
- The performance of artificial intelligence in image-based prediction of hematoma enlargement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Performance in Image-Based Cancer Identification: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- AI-Derived Blood Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in chemotherapy development, cancer diagnosis, and treatment: present achievements and future outlook.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence based on ultrasound for initial diagnosis of malignant ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- The influence of manual segmentation strategies and different phases selection on machine learning-based computed tomography in renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.La Radiologia medica · 2024Pooled it
- Predictive Value of Machine Learning for Platinum Chemotherapy Responses in Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence performance in detecting lymphoma from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Pooled it
- Image-based AI diagnostic performance for fatty liver: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2023Pooled it
- Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Gynecologic Oncology Education: Insights from a Qualitative Study Using Semi-Structured Interviews.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- The Emerging Role of Generalizable Vision-Language Models in Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- A Novel Approach to Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis via CT Imaging: GPT-4o-Driven Automated Feature Recognition and Validation in Clinical Settings.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer research from 2006 to 2025.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Integrating ultrasound-CT-MR for preoperative multi-task prediction in ovarian cancer: achieving diagnostic parity with multidisciplinary team consensus.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI in lung cancer metastasis imaging for diagnosis and prognosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a novel multimodal deep learning approach to improve diagnostic precision in ovarian cancer.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Ovarian cancer recurrence prediction: comparing confirmatory to real-world predictors with machine learning.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate identification of ovarian cancer (OC) is of paramount importance in clinical treatment success. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a potentially reliable assistant for the medical imaging recognition. We systematically review articles on the diagnostic performance of AI in OC from medical imaging for the first time. Methods: The Medline, Embase, IEEE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library databases were searched for related studies published until August 1, 2022. Inclusion criteria were studies that developed or used AI algorithms in the diagnosis of OC from medical images. The binary diagnostic accuracy data were extracted to derive the outcomes of interest: sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and Area Under the Curve (AUC). The study was registered with the PROSPERO, CRD42022324611. Findings: Thirty-four eligible studies were identified, of which twenty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis with a pooled SE of 88% (95%CI: 85-90%), SP of 85% (82-88%), and AUC of 0.93 (0.91-0.95). Analysis for different algorithms revealed a pooled SE of 89% (85-92%) and SP of 88% (82-92%) for machine learning; and a pooled SE of 88% (84-91%) and SP of 84% (80-87%) for deep learning. Acceptable diagnostic performance was demonstrated in subgroup analyses stratified by imaging modalities (Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, or Computed Tomography), sample size (≤300 or >300), AI algorithms versus clinicians, year of publication (before or after 2020), geographical distribution (Asia or non Asia), and the different risk of bias levels (≥3 domain low risk or < 3 domain low risk). Interpretation: AI algorithms exhibited favorable performance for the diagnosis of OC through medical imaging. More rigorous reporting standards that address specific challenges of AI research could improve future studies. Funding: This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82073647 to Q-JW and No. 82103914 to T-TG), LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (No. XLYC1907102 to Q-JW), and 345 Talent Project of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University (No. M0268 to Q-JW and No. M0952 to T-TG).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.