Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147610›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2022

Prospective Optimization of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Assessment for Lung Cancer: Three Needle Agitations Are Noninferior to 10 Agitations for Adequate Tumor Cell and DNA Yield.

David Fielding, Andrew J Dalley, Mahendra Singh, Lakshmy Nandakumar, Katia Nones, Vanessa Lakis, Haarika Chittoory, Kaltin Ferguson, Farzad Bashirzadeh, Michael Bint and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

David FieldingDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Andrew J DalleyUQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Mahendra SinghPathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Lakshmy NandakumarPathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Katia NonesQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Vanessa LakisQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Haarika ChittooryUQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Kaltin FergusonUQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Farzad BashirzadehDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Michael BintDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia.
Carl PahoffDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Australia.
Jung Hwa SonDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, The Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Alan HodgsonPathology Queensland, Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Sowmya SharmaQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
David GodboltPathology Queensland, Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Kylie ColemanPathology Queensland, Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Lenore WhitfieldPathology Queensland, Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Nicola WaddellQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Sunil R LakhaniUQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Gunter HartelQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Peter T SimpsonUQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUPrince Charles Hospital · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUGold Coast Hospital · AUSunshine Coast University Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) is an important means of obtaining a tissue for advanced lung cancer. Optimizing the EBUS TBNA needling technique is important to maintain procedural simplicity and maximize sample quality for emerging molecular diagnostics. Methods: We prospectively explored three versus 10 agitations of the needle in sequential passes into the lymph node using separate needles. Resulting Diff-Quik cytology smears were quantitatively assessed using microscopic (tumor cell cellularity, abundance scores, erythrocyte contamination) and DNA yields. Microscopy was reported by two cytopathologists, and an inter-rater assessment was made by four additional cytopathologists. Results: In 86 patients confirmed as having malignant disease by EBUS TBNA (45 males, 41 females), a mean of 5.3 smears were made per patient with a total of 459 smears scored by pathologists and 168 paired smears extracted for DNA. There was no significant difference between three versus 10 agitations for smear cellularity ( Conclusions: Three agitations are noninferior to 10 agitations for overall abundance of malignant cells and DNA content on smears. A smear with adequate DNA for panel sequencing could almost always be made with the first needle pass using three agitations.

Indexed as

Cytology smearsEBUS TBNALung cancerMolecular testing

Identifiers

PMID36147610
PMCPMC9486562
OpenAlexW4293660318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.