Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147595›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Over Time Prior to Omicron Emergence in Ontario, Canada: Test-Negative Design Study.

Hannah Chung, Peter C Austin, Kevin A Brown, Sarah A Buchan, Deshayne B Fell, Cindy Fong, Jonathan B Gubbay, Sharifa Nasreen, Kevin L Schwartz, Maria E Sundaram and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Population-based evaluation of the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for reducing hospital admissions and mortality from COVID-19.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bias in vaccine effectiveness studies of clinically severe outcomes that are measured with low specificity: the example of COVID-19-related hospitalisation.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah ChungICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9463-3591
Peter C AustinICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kevin A BrownICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah A BuchanICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Deshayne B FellICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cindy FongICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan B GubbayPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sharifa NasreenICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9793-113X
Kevin L SchwartzICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maria E SundaramICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mina TadrousICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kumanan WilsonDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa and Bruyere Hospital Research Institutes, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah E WilsonICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jeffrey C KwongICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAMarshfield Clinic · USPublic Health Ontario · CAUniversity Health Network · CAWomen's College Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Waning protection from 2 doses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines led to third dose availability in multiple countries even before the emergence of the Omicron variant. Methods: We used the test-negative study design to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against any severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, any symptomatic infection, and severe outcomes (COVID-19-related hospitalizations or death) by time since second dose of any combination of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and ChAdOx1 between January 11, and November 21, 2021, for subgroups based on patient and vaccine characteristics. Results: We included 261 360 test-positive cases (of any SARS-CoV-2 lineage) and 2 783 699 individuals as test-negative controls. VE of 2 mRNA vaccine doses decreased from 90% (95% CI, 90%-90%) 7-59 days after the second dose to 75% (95% CI, 72%-78%) after ≥240 days against infection, decreased from 94% (95% CI, 84%-95%) to 87% (95% CI, 85%-89%) against symptomatic infection, and remained stable (98% [95% CI, 97%-98%] to 98% [95% CI, 96%-99%]) against severe outcomes. Similar trends were seen with heterologous ChAdOx1 and mRNA vaccine schedules. VE estimates for dosing intervals <35 days were lower than for longer intervals (eg, VE of 2 mRNA vaccines against symptomatic infection at 120-179 days was 86% [95% CI, 85%-88%] for dosing intervals <35 days, 92% [95% CI, 91%-93%] for 35-55 days, and 91% [95% CI, 90%-92%] for ≥56 days), but when stratified by age group and subperiod, there were no differences between dosing intervals. Conclusions: Before the emergence of Omicron, VE of any 2-dose primary series, including heterologous schedules and varying dosing intervals, decreased over time against any infection and symptomatic infection but remained high against severe outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2vaccine effectivenesswaning immunity

Identifiers

PMID36147595
PMCPMC9487707
OpenAlexW4294884936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.