Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147585›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2022

Cervical sagittal alignment is influenced by changes in thoracic and lumbar sagittal alignments after correction surgery in patients with lenke type 6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Toshiki Okubo, Mitsuru Yagi, Satoshi Suzuki, Yohei Takahashi, Satoshi Nori, Osahiko Tsuji, Narihito Nagoshi, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura, Kota Watanabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparison of cervical sagittal alignment in normal subjects and adolescents and young adults with idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Toshiki OkuboDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Murayama Medical Center, 2-37-1 Gakuen, Musashimurayama, Tokyo 208-0011, Japan.
Mitsuru YagiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Satoshi SuzukiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Yohei TakahashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Satoshi NoriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Osahiko TsujiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Narihito NagoshiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Morio MatsumotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Masaya NakamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Kota WatanabeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Few studies have examined the changes in cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) and its relationship with other sagittal alignments in AIS patients with major thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve who underwent correction surgery. This study investigated the radiographical changes in CSA after correction surgery in patients with Lenke type 6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and assess any possible factors affecting postoperative CSA. Methods: Forty-four patients with Lenke type 6 AIS (3 males and 41 females, mean age at surgery of 15.6 ± 2.8 years) who could be followed up for 3 years after correction surgery were included in this study. Variations of outcome variables were analyzed in various spinal sagittal parameters using radiographic outcomes. Univariate correlation analyses were used to evaluate possible factors influencing the postoperative CSA. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaires and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used for clinical evaluation, and the changes between pre- and 3-year post-operation were compared. Results: The Cobb angle of the major and minor curve was significantly improved after correction surgery. Furthermore, CSA, such as C2-7 angle and T1 slope, changed significantly postoperatively. The magnitude of coronal curve correction did not affect CSA postoperatively, while the postoperative TK, T10-L2 kyphosis and LL were significantly correlated with the postoperative C2-7 angle, respectively. None of the patients in this study complained of neck or low back pain during the period up 3 years after the operation. Comparing each domain of SRS-22 or ODI score, these were unchanged between pre-, 1-year, and 3-year post-operation, with no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: CSA changed significantly after correction surgery, and cervical kyphosis indicated a tendency to decrease in Lenke type 6 AIS patients, which was associated with an improvement in thoracic and lumbar sagittal alignment, not correction for coronal deformity.

Indexed as

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosisC2-7 angle, Thoracic kyphosisCervical sagittal alignmentLenke type 6Lumbar lordosisPosterior correction and fusion surgeryT10-L2 kyphosis

Identifiers

PMID36147585
PMCPMC9486039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.