ArticleFrontiers in genome editing2022
Article in Frontiers in genome editing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fine mapping, introgression, and KASP marker development for powdery mildew resistance in watermelon using an interspecific RIL population (Citrullus mucosospermus × C. lanatus).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Genetic and genomic resources for turfgrasses: status, applications, and prospects.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Phenotypic profiling and identification of trait specific genotypes of seed purpose watermelon in Thar desert of India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Isolation and transformation of perennial ryegrass (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Genome editing for grass improvement and future agriculture.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Strategies and Methods for Improving the Efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing in Plant Molecular Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Strategies for delivery of CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing to obtain edited plants directly without transgene integration.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- Multi-allelic gene editing in an apomictic, tetraploid turf and forage grass (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Improving abiotic stress tolerance of forage grasses - prospects of using genome editing.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome editing technologies provide a powerful tool for genetic improvement of perennial ryegrass, an important forage and turfgrass species worldwide. The sole publication for gene editing in perennial ryegrass used gene-gun for plant transformation and a dual promoter based CRISPR/Cas9 system for editing. However, their editing efficiency was low (5.9% or only one gene-edited plant produced). To test the suitability of the maize Ubiquitin 1 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.