ArticlePHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2021
Phage Commander, an Application for Rapid Gene Identification in Bacteriophage Genomes Using Multiple Programs.
Article in PHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Phage quest: a beginner's guide to explore viral diversity in the prokaryotic world.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Hybrid sequencing reveals the genome of a Chrysochromulina parva virus and highlight its distinct replication strategy.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genomic Analysis of 96Viruses · 2025Article
- Isolation and characterization of 24 phages infecting the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Klebsiella sp. M5al.PloS one · 2025Article
- Isolation and Characterization of Lytic Bacteriophages Capable of Infecting Diverse Multidrug-Resistant Strains ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Characterization and Abundance of Plasmid-Dependent Alphatectivirus Bacteriophages.Microbial ecology · 2024Article
- Complete genome sequences of cluster F1 and cluster B1Microbiology resource announcements · 2024Article
- Isolation and characterization of novel plasmid-dependent phages infecting bacteria carrying diverse conjugative plasmids.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Complete genome sequences of cluster G1 and cluster K4Microbiology resource announcements · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Computational Tools for the Analysis of Uncultivated Phage Genomes.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022Review
- Phage Annotation Guide: Guidelines for Assembly and High-Quality Annotation.PHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Complete Genome Sequences of Cluster A6 and Cluster G1 Mycobacterium smegmatis Phages Hoot and Jolene.Microbiology resource announcements · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of sequenced bacteriophage genomes is growing at an exponential rate. The majority of sequenced bacteriophage genomes are annotated by one or more of several freely available gene identification programs (Glimmer, GeneMark, RAST, Prodigal, etc.). No program has been shown to consistently outperform the others; thus, the choice of which program to use is not obvious. We present the Phage Commander application for rapid identification of bacteriophage genes using multiple gene identification programs. Phage Commander runs a bacteriophage genome sequence through nine gene identification programs (and an additional program for identification of tRNAs) and integrates the results within a single output table. Phage Commander also generates formatted output files for direct export to National Center for Biotechnology Information GenBank or genome visualization programs such as DNA Master. Users can select the threshold for which genes to export (genes identified by at least one program, genes identified by at least two programs, etc.). Phage Commander was benchmarked using eight high-quality bacteriophage genomes whose genes are backed by experimental data. Our results show that the most accurate annotations are obtained by exporting genes identified by at least two or three programs. Many groups opt to manually curate the annotations obtained from gene identification programs, and Phage Commander was designed to facilitate manual curation of genome annotations. Our benchmarking results show that manual curation does indeed produce more accurate annotations than any individual gene identification program. The authors thus recommend manually curating the output of Phage Commander to generate maximally accurate annotations. Phage Commander is currently being used in the corresponding author's bacteriophage genome annotation class and has reduced the labor cost and improved the quality of genome annotations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.