ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2022
Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for post Caesarean analgesia: A randomized prospective controlled study.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block and other regional blocks for postoperative pain in cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of analgesic modalities after cesarean section: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for prevention of postoperative pain in women undergoing laparoscopic and robotic gynaecological surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Transversus abdominis plane blocks in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of erector spinae plane block versus quadratus lumborum block for post-caesarean analgesia: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Review
- Outcomes of quadratus lumborum blocks for pain control after open abdominal wall reconstruction: a single institution retrospective analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- The Shining Star of the Last Decade in Regional Anesthesia Part-II: Interfascial Plane Blocks for Cardiac, Abdominal, and Spine Surgery.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2023Article
- Regional Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review Toward Enhancing Outcomes in Parturients.Journal of pain research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effective postoperative analgesia after lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) is very important for early ambulation and early breast feeding and has a role to play in decreasing postpartum depression. Quadratus lumborum (QL) block, a fascial plane block, is gaining popularity for pain management in lower abdominal surgeries. The aim of the present study was to compare the ultrasound-guided (USG) transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and QL block in patients undergoing LSCS under spinal anaesthesia. Methods: Double-blinded, randomized, controlled, single-centre study done between Aug 2019 and Oct 2019, randomised 80 patients scheduled for LSCS into two groups, QL (N = 40) and TAP (N = 40), receiving USG TAP or QL block 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 4 mg dexamethasone bilaterally, postoperatively. Results: SSPS 20 was used for the statistical analysis Patients were evaluated for 24-h using visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain scores, time to rescue analgesia and the analgesic dose requirement at regular time intervals. Fifteen percent patients in QL block and 75% in TAP block required rescue analgesia (P < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in pain scores at 10 h postoperatively, VAS in QL=1.18 (0.55), TAP=3.08 (1.66) (P < 0.001). By 24 h postoperatively the difference ceased to be statistically significant. Time to rescue analgesia in QL group was 1353 min (+/-224.07) and TAP group 915 min (+/-391.62) (P < 0.001). Average requirement of rescue analgesia (paracetamol) in QL group was 153.84 mg, TAP group 756.09 mg. Conclusions: Patients receiving QL block had prolonged analgesic effects and required less use of rescue analgesia in comparison with TAP group in the first 24 h postoperatively. Trial number: CTRI/2019/07/020475.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.