Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147383›Full record

ReviewMedical journal, Armed Forces India2022

Single-cell sequencing: A cutting edge tool in molecular medical research.

Pratibha Misra, Amruta R Jadhav, Sharmila A Bapat

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pratibha MisraSenior Advisor (Pathology & Biochemistry), 151 Base Hospital, Guwahati, India.
Amruta R JadhavSenior Research Fellow, National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, India.
Sharmila A BapatProfessor & Head, Ovarian Cancer Program, National Centre for Cell Science, (NCCS), Pune, India.
National Centre for Cell Science · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of advanced high throughput technologies and introduction of high resolution "omics" data through analysis of biological molecules has revamped medical research. Single-cell sequencing in recent years, is in fact revolutionising the field by providing a deeper, spatio-temporal analyses of individual cells within tissues and their relevance to disease. Like conventional sequencing, the single-cell approach deciphers the sequence of nucleotides in a given Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid (DNA), Ribose Nucleic Acid (RNA), Micro Ribose Nucleic Acid (miRNA), epigenetically modified DNA or chromatin DNA; however, the unit of analyses is changed to single cells rather than the entire tissue. Further, a large number of single cells analysed from a single tissue generate a unique holistic perception capturing all kinds of perturbations across different cells in the tissue that increases the precision of data. Inherently, execution of the technique generates a large amount of data, which is required to be processed in a specific manner followed by customised bioinformatic analysis to produce meaningful results. The most crucial role of single-cell sequencing technique is in elucidating the inter-cell genetic, epigenetic, transcriptomic and proteomic heterogeneity in health and disease. The current review presents a brief overview of this cutting-edge technology and its applications in medical research.

Indexed as

EpigenomeGenomeSequencing data analysisSingle-cell sequencingTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID36147383
PMCPMC9485843
OpenAlexW4293167984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.