Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147293›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2022

A cross-national and longitudinal analysis of handwashing and its predictors during the COVID-19 pandemic in France and Belgium.

Mathias Schmitz, Robin Wollast, Alix Bigot, Olivier Luminet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mathias SchmitzInstitute for Research in the Psychological Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-5874
Robin WollastInstitute for Research in the Psychological Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-9969
Alix BigotInstitute for Research in the Psychological Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-7653
Olivier LuminetInstitute for Research in the Psychological Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1519-2178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing a longitudinal design, we investigate how the adherence to handwashing and its underlying socio-psychological predictors evolved over time during the COVID-19 pandemic and under distinct circumstances (e.g. when the crisis was more acute or chronic).

methodWe collected data (

resultsRegression models suggest that the compliance with handwashing and its pattern of underlying predictors remained remarkably stable over time despite the variations in contextual factors such as the severity of the health crisis and the stringency of health measures. As such, the findings also highlight the robustness of the models that predict it, namely the Theory of Planned Behavior. The intentions to perform the behavior, the perceived control over it, and being part of the (para)medical field were among the strongest predictors.

conclusionsIn practice, the stability of the underlying factors suggests a set of action levers that can be used in communication campaigns aimed at fostering its adherence throughout the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Handwashinghealth behaviorpandemicTPB

Identifiers

PMID36147293
PMCPMC9487924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.