Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147247›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2022

Impact of conditional economic incentives and motivational interviewing on health outcomes of adolescents living with HIV in Anambra State, Nigeria: A cluster-randomised trial.

Obinna Ikechukwu Ekwunife, Maureen Ugonwa Anetoh, Stephen Okorafor Kalu, Prince Udegbunam Ele, Bolaji Emmanuel Egbewale, George Uchenna Eleje

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Obinna Ikechukwu EkwunifeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
Maureen Ugonwa AnetohDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
Stephen Okorafor KaluVirology Laboratory, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria.
Prince Udegbunam EleDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria.
Bolaji Emmanuel EgbewaleDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.
George Uchenna ElejeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) have had worse outcomes compared to adults. They face enormous difficulty in accessing HIV care services. We hypothesize that conditional economic incentives (CEI) and motivational interviewing could increase retention in care, medication adherence and ultimately viral load suppression. Therefore, we evaluated the one-year impact of conditional economic incentives and motivational interviewing on the health outcomes of ALHIV in Anambra State, Nigeria. Methods: Using a cluster-randomised design, we examined the one-year (from December 1, 2018, to November 30, 2019), individual-level impact of an Incentive Scheme comprising conditional economic incentives and motivational interviewing on achieving undetectable viral load (primary outcome), CD4 Results: Of the 246 trial participants, 119 were in the intervention while 127 were in the control arm. There was no difference in the baseline characteristics of the participants between the intervention and control arm except for the number of participants with undetectable viral load and the number of participants with ≥95% adherence. Although participants in the intervention arm had a 10.1% increase while those in the control arm had a 1.6% decrease in proportion with undetectable viral load (≤20 copies/ml) after 12 months, the change in the primary outcome was not statistically significant. Similarly, the differences in the secondary outcomes were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The Incentive Scheme did not improve the virologic outcome of ALHIV after 12 months. Differences in the secondary outcomes after 12 months were also not significantly different from the baseline. Trial registration: We registered the trial retrospectively with The Pan African Clinical Trials Registry: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/(PACTR201806003040425) on 2/2/2018.

Indexed as

AdolescenceAIDSCluster-randomised trialConditional cash transferFinancial incentivesHIVMotivational interviewingNigeria

Identifiers

PMID36147247
PMCPMC9486535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.