Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147188›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in penile cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Haviv Muris Saputra, Furqan Hidayatullah, Yudhistira Pradnyan Kloping, Johan Renaldo, Eric Chung, Lukman Hakim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prognostic value of pretreatment peripheral blood hemoglobin×lymphocyte/monocyte ratio in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haviv Muris SaputraDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Furqan HidayatullahDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Yudhistira Pradnyan KlopingDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Johan RenaldoDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Eric ChungDepartment of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Lukman HakimDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Penile cancer is rare among male malignancies. Various biomarkers have been used to predict the prognosis of cancer, one of which is the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of NLR in penile cancer. Methods: This review was conducted following the PRISMA guideline. Several databases, including Scopus, Science-direct, and PubMed, were systematically searched. The primary outcomes were lymph node metastasis (LNM), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). All statistical analyses were processed using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4. Results: A total of six retrospective studies were included in the analysis. The cut-off values of NLR in the included studies ranged from 2.6 to 3.59. Meta-analysis showed that penile cancer patients with high NLR had worse LNM and CSS based on the univariate analysis (OR 3.56, 95% CI 2.38, 5.32, p < 0.01; HR 4.19, 95% CI 2.19, 8.01, p = 0.0; respectively). Furthermore, the meta-analysis revealed that NLR is an independent predictor of LNM and CSS (OR 6.67, 95% CI 2.44, 18.22, p < 0.01; HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.23, 3.73, p < 0.01; respectively). However, NLR failed to show as independent predictor for OS (HR 1.69,95% CI 0.95,3.00, p = 0.07). Conclusion: NLR is an independent predictor of LNM and CSS. However, NLR is not proven to be an independent predictor of OS in this study.

Indexed as

CancerCancer-specific survivalNeutrophil to lymphocyte ratioOverall survivalPenile cancer

Identifiers

PMID36147188
PMCPMC9486611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.