ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Prenatal diagnosis of rare cloacal exstrophy: A case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical management of Omphalocele-Exstrophy-Imperforate Anus-Spinal Defect (OEIS) complex: A case report.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- Understanding and managing a case of the omphalocele-exstrophy-imperforate anus-spinal defect complex.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Role of ultrasound scan in prenatal diagnosis of cloacal exstrophy.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Cloacal Exstrophy (CE) is a rare congenital birth defect. A correct prenatal diagnosis of CE is rarely made, even when congenital abnormalities are suspected on prenatal ultrasound examination. Case presentation: We report a case of CE with an abdominal defect about 5.31 cm in diameter seen below the umbilicus covered by a membrane. It was difficult to identify the left kidney, the bladder, the genital, and the anal dimple in the early third trimester ultrasound. The diagnosis of CE was then confirmed postnatally. Clinical discussion: Omphalocele and persistent bladder nonvisualization despite normal amniotic fluid volume detected by prenatal ultrasound can be suggestive for CE. Conclusion: Accurate prenatal diagnosis of CE is important to carry out multidisciplinary management and prenatal counseling to parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.