Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147065›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Congenital talipes equinovarus: A literature review.

M Nasser Mustari, Muhammad Faruk, Arman Bausat, Achmad Fikry

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cadaveric Dissection of Adult Neglected Talipes Equinovarus.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M Nasser MustariDivision of Orthopedic and Traumatology Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Muhammad FarukDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Arman BausatDivision of Orthopedic and Traumatology Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Achmad FikryDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Hasanuddin University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) is a congenital disability characterized by leg deformities in the cavus, adducts, varus, and equinus. The etiology of CTEV is poorly understood, despite its incidence ranging from 0.76 to 3.49 cases per 1000 live births in Indonesia. CTEV involves the fixation of the foot in the adducts, varus, and equinus with concurrent soft tissue anomalies. Despite advances in treatment, disability often persists. Theoretical models have been proposed for neurological, vascular, connective tissue, bone, and muscular causes; however, the currently available data suggests that mild cases are associated with intrauterine position. CTEV's etiology appears to involve a hereditary component, as its prevalence varies by ethnic group. Genetic factors have been identified in 24-50% of cases, depending on the community studied. Based on a complex segregation analysis, the most plausible inheritance pattern is a single large-effect gene interacting with a polygenic background.

Indexed as

ClubfootCongenital talipes equinovarusCTEVEtiologyReview study

Identifiers

PMID36147065
PMCPMC9486628
OpenAlexW4292417300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.