Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36147057›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Histopathological examination of cases with acute appendicitis, A retrospective study at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Mai Kadi, Ali Nasr, Alaa A Shabkah, Rothana Alnahari, Afnan Alhawi, Romaysaa Alyamani, Abdulaziz M Saleem

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mai KadiDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ali NasrDepartment of Surgery, International Medical Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Alaa A ShabkahDepartment of Surgery, International Medical Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Rothana AlnahariDepartment of Surgery, King Abdullah Medical Complex, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Afnan AlhawiDepartment of Surgery, Alnoor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Romaysaa AlyamaniDepartment of Critical Care, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz M SaleemDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz University · SAKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Appendicitis is one of the most prevalent abdominal emergencies globally. Despite the fact that acute appendicitis is a clinical diagnosis, preoperative imaging investigations are often conducted. Other disorders that might mimic acute appendicitis can occur in the appendix. The aim of this paper is to describe the histopathological findings of all appendectomy specimens. Methods: A retrospective study of 940 cases of appendectomy that were performed between 2010 and 2017 at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia were reviewed. The main outcome measured in this study is to describe the histopathological findings of all appendectomy specimens. The secondary outcomes measured in this study were the disease incidence in relation to age, and gender. Moreover, the accuracy of imaging diagnostic tools were also evaluated. Results: This study included 940 participants who underwent an appendectomy procedure. The patients' mean age was 23.4 years (±12.2), with a 3:2 male to female proportion. The incidence in males and females were 59.4% and 40.6%, respectively. Being male (p < 0.001), undergoing preoperative ultrasound (p < 0.001), having elevated white blood cells count (p < 0.001) was significantly associated with accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis confirmed by histopathology. In this study, the negative cases of appendectomy that account for 14.4% were reported primarily as normal appendix with no inflammatory changes (7.44%) followed by other unexpected findings in the appendectomy specimen (3.93%) that included faecolith, granulomas, mucocele, endometriosis, food/fecal impaction, and schistosomiasis. Our study showed CT sensitivity as a diagnostic tool of acute appendicitis is 90.2%, and its accuracy is 89.4%, while US sensitivity is 46% and its accuracy is 52.4%. Conclusion: Histopathological evaluation after common procedures, such as appendectomy, is essential to avoid missing other pathologies in the appendix. Surgeons should be aware of the uncommon histopathology findings as some disorders call for additional management beyond appendectomy. The clinical details, radiological investigations including CT scan and histopathological diagnoses are required for better management in cases of appendicular lesions.

Indexed as

Acute appendicitisAppendicitis diagnosisAppendixPathology

Identifiers

PMID36147057
PMCPMC9486616
OpenAlexW4294309012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.