Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36146766›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Vaccinia-Virus-Based Vaccines Are Expected to Elicit Highly Cross-Reactive Immunity to the 2022 Monkeypox Virus.

Syed Faraz Ahmed, Muhammad Saqib Sohail, Ahmed Abdul Quadeer, Matthew R McKay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Syed Faraz AhmedDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6086-0307
Muhammad Saqib SohailDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9096-7634
Ahmed Abdul QuadeerDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5295-9067
Matthew R McKayDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8086-2545

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beginning in May 2022, a novel cluster of monkeypox virus infections was detected in humans. This virus has spread rapidly to non-endemic countries, sparking global concern. Specific vaccines based on the vaccinia virus (VACV) have demonstrated high efficacy against monkeypox viruses in the past and are considered an important outbreak control measure. Viruses observed in the current outbreak carry distinct genetic variations that have the potential to affect vaccine-induced immune recognition. Here, by investigating genetic variation with respect to orthologous immunogenic vaccinia-virus proteins, we report data that anticipates immune responses induced by VACV-based vaccines, including the currently available MVA-BN and ACAM2000 vaccines, to remain highly cross-reactive against the newly observed monkeypox viruses.

Indexed as

Monkeypox virusSmallpox VaccineVaccinia virusCross ReactionsHumansSmallpox VaccineACAM2000Dryvaxepitopesgenetic similarityimmunitymonkeypoxMVA-BNneutralizing antibodiesT cellsvaccinesvaccinia virus

Identifiers

PMID36146766
PMCPMC9506226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.