Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36146751›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus (PRRSv): A Cross-Sectional Study on ELISA Seronegative, Multivaccinated Sows.

Jorian Fiers, Marylène Tignon, Ann Brigitte Cay, Xavier Simons, Dominiek Maes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jorian FiersUnit Viral Re-emerging, Enzootic and Bee diseases, Department Infectious diseases in animals, Sciensano, Groeselenbergstraat 99, 1066 Ukkel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3721-274X
Marylène TignonUnit Viral Re-emerging, Enzootic and Bee diseases, Department Infectious diseases in animals, Sciensano, Groeselenbergstraat 99, 1066 Ukkel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9781-5289
Ann Brigitte CayUnit Viral Re-emerging, Enzootic and Bee diseases, Department Infectious diseases in animals, Sciensano, Groeselenbergstraat 99, 1066 Ukkel, Belgium.
Xavier SimonsUnit Veterinary Epidemiology, Department Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Rue Ernest Blerot 1, 1070 Anderlecht, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9163-9381
Dominiek MaesUnit of Porcine Health Management, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Sciensano (Belgium) · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus (PRRSv) is widely used to control clinical disease, but the effectiveness appears in some cases to be suboptimal. Field reports have stated the presence of routinely PRRSv-vaccinated but ELISA seronegative sows: the ELISA non-responders. The real extent of this phenomenon (prevalence-origin-consequences) was not yet investigated. In this study, the prevalence of ELISA non-responders was assessed by measuring PRRSv-specific antibodies in 1400 sows, originating from 70 PRRSv-vaccinating sow herds, using IDEXX ELISA (ELISA 1) and CIVTEST E/S ELISA (ELISA 2). Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were quantified in a virus neutralization assay. Univariable logistic regression was used to identify herd risk factors for the presence of ELISA non-responders. The global prevalence of non-responders varied from 3.5% (ELISA 1) to 4.1% (ELISA 2), the herd-level prevalence was 40% and the within-herd prevalence ranged from 5% to 20% (ELISA 1) and from 5% to 30% (ELISA 2). The ELISA non-responders had significantly lower NAbs than the ELISA responders. Herds using the combination of one modified live vaccine and one killed vaccine had a significantly reduced risk of having ELISA non-responders. A first assessment of the prevalence and possible consequences of ELISA non-responders has been provided by this study. The clinical importance, origin and underlying immunological mechanisms warrant further research.

Indexed as

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusViral VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCross-Sectional StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleSwineVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralVaccines, InactivatedViral Vaccinesimmunologynon-responderPRRSvsowvaccination

Identifiers

PMID36146751
PMCPMC9501492
OpenAlexW4294233663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.