Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36146745›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Comparison of Physical and Biochemical Characterizations of SARS-CoV-2 Inactivated by Different Treatments.

Shouzhi Yu, Yangyang Wei, Hongyang Liang, Wenheng Ji, Zhen Chang, Siman Xie, Yichuan Wang, Wanli Li, Yingwei Liu, Hao Wu and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shouzhi YuBeijing Institute of Biological Products Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China.
Yangyang WeiBeijing Institute of Biological Products Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China.
Hongyang LiangBeijing Institute of Biological Products Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China.
Wenheng JiBeijing Institute of Biological Products Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China.
Zhen ChangBeijing Institute of Biological Products Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China.
Siman XieBeijing Institute of Biological Products Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China.
Yichuan WangBeijing Institute of Biological Products Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China.
Wanli LiBeijing Institute of Biological Products Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China.
Yingwei LiuBeijing Institute of Biological Products Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China.
Hao WuBeijing Institute of Biological Products Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China.
Jie LiBeijing Institute of Biological Products Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China.
Hui WangBeijing Institute of Biological Products Company Limited, Beijing 100176, China.
Xiaoming YangChina National Biotec Group Company Limited, Beijing 100024, China.
National Vaccine and Serum Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused huge social and economic distress. Given its rapid spread and the lack of specific treatment options, SARS-CoV-2 needs to be inactivated according to strict biosafety measures during laboratory diagnostics and vaccine development. The inactivation method for SARS-CoV-2 affects research related to the natural virus and its immune activity as an antigen in vaccines. In this study, we used size exclusion chromatography, western blotting, ELISA, an electron microscope, dynamic light scattering, circular dichroism, and surface plasmon resonance to evaluate the effects of four different chemical inactivation methods on the physical and biochemical characterization of SARS-CoV-2. Formaldehyde and β-propiolactone (BPL) treatment can completely inactivate the virus and have no significant effects on the morphology of the virus. None of the four tested inactivation methods affected the secondary structure of the virus, including the α-helix, antiparallel β-sheet, parallel β-sheet, β-turn, and random coil. However, formaldehyde and long-term BPL treatment (48 h) resulted in decreased viral S protein content and increased viral particle aggregation, respectively. The BPL treatment for 24 h can completely inactivate SARS-CoV-2 with the maximum retention of the morphology, physical properties, and the biochemical properties of the potential antigens of the virus. In summary, we have established a characterization system for the comprehensive evaluation of virus inactivation technology, which has important guiding significance for the development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants and research on natural SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesFormaldehydeHumansPropiolactoneVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesFormaldehydePropiolactoneVaccines, InactivatedformaldehydeSARS-CoV-2S proteinsurface plasmon resonancevirus inactivationβ-propiolactone

Identifiers

PMID36146745
PMCPMC9503440
OpenAlexW4294233629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.