Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36146626›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Antibody Titers and Protection against Omicron (BA.1 and BA.2) SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Chloé Dimeglio, Marion Migueres, Naémie Bouzid, Sabine Chapuy-Regaud, Caroline Gernigon, Isabelle Da-Silva, Marion Porcheron, Guillaume Martin-Blondel, Fabrice Herin, Jacques Izopet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels in a Cohort of Health Care Workers Before and After the Omicron Wave in Canada.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chloé DimeglioCHU Toulouse, Hôpital Purpan, Virology Laboratory, 31300 Toulouse, France.
Marion MigueresCHU Toulouse, Hôpital Purpan, Virology Laboratory, 31300 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7791-3201
Naémie BouzidCHU Toulouse, Hôpital Purpan, Virology Laboratory, 31300 Toulouse, France.
Sabine Chapuy-RegaudCHU Toulouse, Hôpital Purpan, Virology Laboratory, 31300 Toulouse, France.
Caroline GernigonOccupational Diseases Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 31000 Toulouse, France.
Isabelle Da-SilvaCHU Toulouse, Hôpital Purpan, Virology Laboratory, 31300 Toulouse, France.
Marion PorcheronCHU Toulouse, Hôpital Purpan, Virology Laboratory, 31300 Toulouse, France.
Guillaume Martin-BlondelToulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (INFINITy), 31300 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8363-7028
Fabrice HerinOccupational Diseases Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 31000 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0689-7608
Jacques IzopetCHU Toulouse, Hôpital Purpan, Virology Laboratory, 31300 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8462-3234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern has greatly influenced the immune correlates of protection, and there are little data about the antibody threshold concentrations to protect against infection with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 or BA.2. We analyzed the antibody responses of 259 vaccinated healthcare workers, some of whom had been previously infected by SARS-CoV-2. The median follow-up was 179 days (IQR: 171-182) after blood collection. We detected 88 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infections during the follow-up period, 55 (62.5%) with SARS-CoV-2 BA.1, and 33 (37.5%) with SARS-CoV-2 BA.2. A neutralizing antibody titer below 8 provided no protection against a BA.1 infection, a titer of 16 or 32 gave 73.2% protection, and a titer of 64 or 128 provided 78.4% protection. Conversely, the BA.2 infection rate did not vary as a function of anti-BA.2 neutralizing antibody titers. Binding antibody concentrations below 6000 BAU/mL provided no protection against Omicron BA.1 infection, 6000-20,000 BAU/mL provided 55.6% protection, and 20,000 or more provided 87.7% protection. There was no difference in BA.2 infection depending on the binding antibody concentration. Further studies are needed to investigate the relationship between antibody concentrations and infection with the Omicron BA.4/5 variants that are becoming predominant worldwide.

Indexed as

antibodiesOmicronprotectionpublic healthSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36146626
PMCPMC9506424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.