Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36146608›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

COVID-19 Vaccination Status and Hesitancy among Breast Cancer Patients after Two Years of Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Weijing Liu, Yunhao Wu, Ruoning Yang, Ruixian Chen, Ya Huang, Xin Zhao, Min Xie, Qintong Li, Qiang Wang, Jie Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Predictive factors of delayed viral clearance of asymptomatic Omicron-related COVID-19 screened positive in patients with cancer receiving active anticancer treatment.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Weijing LiuDepartment of Breast Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9654-6208
Yunhao WuDepartment of Breast Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Ruoning YangDepartment of Breast Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Ruixian ChenDepartment of Breast Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5347-7094
Ya HuangDepartment of Breast Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Xin ZhaoDepartment of Breast Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Min XieMental Health Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Qintong LiDepartments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Development and Related Diseases of Women and Children Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8447-9770
Qiang WangMental Health Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Breast Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University Z20192011National Natural Science Foundation of China 31971141National Natural Science Foundation of China 32071284National Natural Science Foundation of China 82071651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with cancer show greater susceptibility and vulnerability to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. However, data on the vaccination status among patients with breast cancer and any structured analysis of the factors influencing patients’ decisions regarding vaccines are lacking. Methods: This cross-sectional study on patients with breast cancer in China was conducted from 1 June 2022, to 17 June 2022. Every participant completed an online questionnaire about their vaccination status and any adverse reactions, and a scale based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) to assess the vaccination status of respondents and their willingness to receive following doses or boosters. Results: Among the 1132 participants, 55.2% had received a COVID-19 vaccine. The incidence of adverse events per dose was around 40%. Vaccine hesitancy of 61.9% was observed among patients who had not fully received three doses of vaccine or boosters. The only variable found to be associated with vaccine hesitancy was time since diagnosis (p < 0.05). In the HBM scale, vaccine hesitancy was closely related to a low level of perceived susceptibility, a low level of perceived benefit, a high level of perceived barriers and a low level of agreement with doctors’ advice. Conclusions: For patients with breast cancer, perceived susceptibility, benefits and barriers should be prioritized, and the advice from authoritative doctors is a vital cue to action.

Indexed as

adverse eventbooster vaccinationbreast cancerCOVID-19vaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36146608
PMCPMC9503096
OpenAlexW4296045657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.